Author Archives: See Below

Saudi Crown Prince Likens Iran’s Supreme Leader to Hitler

His comments on Iran also suggested that he would seek further cooperation with the United States in combating Iranian influence in the Middle East, a goal he shares with the Trump administration.

In the interview, Prince Mohammed, 32, played down Iran’s power, saying its army was not well ranked in the Muslim world and that Saudi Arabia had a larger economy.

Photo
The Saudi prince said that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader, “wants to create his own project in the Middle East very much like Hitler, who wanted to expand at the time.”

Credit
Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader, via Associated Press

“Iran is far from being equal to Saudi Arabia,” he said, speaking through a translator.

When asked about his previous comments comparing Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader of Iran, to Hitler, he replied, “Absolutely.”

“He wants to create his own project in the Middle East very much like Hitler, who wanted to expand at the time,” Prince Mohammed said. “Many countries around the world and in Europe did not realize how dangerous Hitler was until what happened, happened. I don’t want to see the same events happening in the Middle East.”

Newsletter Sign Up

Continue reading the main story

He was then asked whether Saudi Arabia sought nuclear weapons to counter Iran.

“Saudi Arabia does not want to acquire any nuclear bomb, but without a doubt if Iran developed a nuclear bomb, we will follow suit as soon as possible,” he said.

Saudi officials grew furious with the Obama administration for its push with other world powers to reach an agreement placing limits on Iran’s nuclear capabilities.

Like Israeli leaders and many Republicans in the United States, they claimed that the agreement would merely delay Iran’s quest for nuclear weapons, while ignoring Iran’s other activities, like supporting Shiite militias.

Iran has insisted that its nuclear program was peaceful and intended to produce only energy and research, not weapons.

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story

Saudi Arabia has not been known to seek nuclear weapons, but its cabinet this week approved a policy for a new atomic energy program.

The new policy stated that “all nuclear activities will be restricted to peaceful purposes, within the framework defined by international legislations, treaties and conventions,” according to a statement released by the government on Wednesday. It remained unclear when work on the new program would begin.

The “60 Minutes” interview with Prince Mohammed will be broadcast on Sunday.

Continue reading the main story

Fear and Loathing and Money in Pennsylvania

The special election in the 18th congressional district of Pennsylvania this week will have mirror opposite effects on the two parties.

Democrats, enthused by victory in a district that voted for Donald Trump by almost 20 points in 2016, will contribute more money and time to Democratic candidates. Republicans, alarmed by a potentially disastrous cascade — loss of control of the House followed by two years of public hearings into Trump’s malfeasance followed by more electoral trouble — will call on corporate benefactors and wealthy donors to increase funding to stave off defeat.

Former Republican Representative Tom DeLay, the onetime golden arch extending from K Street to the conservative movement’s operational base in the GOP House, once complained that “Americans spend more money on potato chips than they do on all political races put together.” As the partisan struggle for political, cultural and legal supremacy grows ever more bitter, political spending is ratcheting up.

For Republicans, the results in Pennsylvania are unspinnable: The chips are down. Democrat Conor Lamb improved on Hillary Clinton’s performance in the district among both non-college-educated whites and more affluent suburban whites. Republicans, carrying the weight of Trump’s unfitness, tried multiple messages. “It means that nothing is working for them — not the tax bill, not tariffs, not Trump rallying his so-called base, and not their attacks on Pelosi,” said Democratic pollster Geoff Garin in an email.

According to Bloomberg Government, $17.5 million had been spent in the district by election eve. The Democrat Lamb out-raised the Republican Rick Saccone among individual campaign donors by around 4-to-1 — a measure of Democratic intensity. Republicans countered by spending more than $10 million via outside groups, including the National Rifle Association, for a 10-to-1 advantage in independent spending.

Not all spending is equal, however. On television, candidates are given the lowest rate for advertising. Outside groups are not. As the airwaves grow more cluttered with ads, it can cost twice as much, even more, to air an ad financed by an outside organization as one funded by a candidate.

Consequently, at least on television, Lamb’s money bought more than the money provided by Republican groups. That imbalance seems likely to play out in multiple districts this fall, with Democrats drawing more funds from small donors and Republicans relying more on interest groups.

The Pennsylvania special election did not hit the heights of absurdity reached by the special election in 2017 in Georgia’s sixth congressional district, outside Atlanta, where neophyte Democrat Jon Ossoff spent a truly ridiculous $29 million in a losing effort. That congressional race, the most expensive in history, burned up $60 million all told.

But spending $17.5 million on a House race outside Pittsburgh — the final tally will no doubt be higher — is crazy enough, especially given that television ad rates in Pittsburgh are about one-fourth of what they cost in Atlanta.

No one, not even the surest loser, turns away contributions. “There’s always an incentive to keep going,” said GOP strategist Mike Murphy in a telephone interview. “You get your first bad poll back, and you say, ‘Well, maybe we can turn this around by running our new Dancing Bear ad.’ And so you pile a bunch of money into your Dancing Bear ad. Nobody’s saying, ‘Spend less money.’”

When money flows freely, campaigns avoid difficult either-or tactical decisions. Instead, they opt for all of the above. “It gets to be overkill at some point,” emailed pollster Paul Maslin, who advised the amply funded 2017 campaign of Democratic Senator Doug Jones of Alabama. “But Alabama for us wasn’t all that different, and, believe me, we were glad to have every extra million we did — social media, radio, African American turnout, mail, as well as normal broadcast and cable TV.”

Jones spent more than $20 million last fall in his special election victory over Republican Roy Moore. The previous three Democratic Senate nominees for that seat, who had no hope of victory, spent $4,500 (2014), $333,000 (2008) and $1 million (2002).

Mass killer Dylann Roof’s sister charged with carrying weapons at SC high school

On a day when tens of thousands of students across the county walked out of classes to protest gun violence, the sister of notorious mass killer Dylann Roof was arrested in South Carolina after allegedly carrying a knife and pepper spray on school property.

Morgan Roof, 18, a student at A.C. Flora High School in Columbia, was charged Wednesday with two counts of carrying weapons on school property and possession of marijuana, according to records at the Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center where she was taken.

Students at her school became alarmed Wednesday at her Snapchat post disparaging National Walkout Day, which was being held in response to a mass shooting at a high school in Parkland, Fla., that left 17 dead. Roof’s post said she hoped “it’s a trap and y’all get shot” and “we know it’s fixing to be nothing but black people walkin out anyway,” authorities told local news outlets.

The Richland County Sheriff’s Department confirmed to the State newspaper that Morgan is the sister of Dylann Roof, who fatally shot nine black members of a Charleston church during a Bible study in 2015. Roof, a self-described white supremacist, told authorities that he targeted a historic black church in hopes of starting a race war. A month after the killings, South Carolina removed the Confederate flag from the statehouse grounds, ending its 54-year presence at the Capitol.

In December 2016, a jury convicted Roof on 33 federal hate crime charges in connection with the killings at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church. He was sentenced to death in January 2017. Four months later, he pleaded guilty to state charges — nine counts of murder, three counts of attempted murder charges and a related weapons charge. A deal with prosecutors allowed him to avoid a second death penalty trial and be given a sentence of life in prison without parole.

After Wednesday’s incident, Morgan Roof is not allowed to return to school, WLTX-19 reported.

“A student used social media to post hateful messages,” Susan Childs, the school’s principal, said Wednesday in a statement to parents. “The posting was not a threat, but was extremely inappropriate. That student was dealt with in a swift and severe manner as the posting caused quite a disruption.”

A second student was also arrested at the school this week for allegedly having a loaded magazine, The State reported. A Smith Wesson .380 handgun was recovered on school grounds with information provided by students, authorities told the news outlet. The student, who was not identified, was released to the custody of his parents, the newspaper said.

The principal’s statement did not mention the arrests. On the second matter, she wrote: “In an isolated incident yesterday, administration was notified that there was possibly a weapon on campus. Through diligent work from the Assistant Principals and the School Resource Officers, an unloaded weapon was recovered. The investigation of this matter involves law enforcement as well as school officials.”

Gov. Henry McMaster said on Twitter that “we owe a debt of gratitude to all involved” for acting quickly and decisively.

“Potential tragedy was avoided at AC Flora High School. In two separate incidents, students and educators reacted quickly to reports of suspicious activity and behavior to their Richland County Sheriff’s Department school resource officer.”

More from Morning Mix:

Gun-trained teacher accidentally discharges firearm in Calif. classroom, injuring student

US, France and Germany join Britain in saying Russia likely responsible for chemical attack against former spy

The United States and two major European allies on Thursday formally backed Britain’s claims that Russia was likely responsible for a chemical toxin attack against a former spy living in England, calling it the “first offensive use of a nerve agent” in Europe since World War II.

The joint statement from the leaders of France, Germany, the United States and Britain signaled another step in mounting international pressure on Russia over apparent ties to the assault.

The statement said the four nations shared the view of British investigators of Russian ties to last week’s attack against a former double agent and his daughter.

There was no “plausible alternative explanation,” the statement added, noting that Russia’s “failure to address the legitimate request by the U.K. government further underlines its responsibility.”

“It is an assault on U.K. sovereignty and any such use by a state party is a clear violation of the Chemical Weapons Convention and a breach of international law,” said the statement, released by the office of the British prime minister.

British Prime Minister Theresa May, right, Wiltshire Police’s Chief Constable Kier Pritchard, center, and MP for Salisbury and South Wiltshire John Glen visit the scene visited by Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia before they were found on a nearby bench on March 15, 2018 in Salisbury, England. (Jack Taylor/Getty Images)

“It threatens the security of us all,” it added, without spelling out any possible further reprisals by the United Kingdom and its allies.

The next move in the deepening standoff could come from Moscow.

Russia promised Thursday to respond “very soon” to Britain’s decision to expel 23 Russian diplomats, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said. Britain made the move in response to the use of an alleged Russian nerve agent against a former Russian spy last week in the quiet town of Salisbury in southern England.

“The answer will come very soon, I assure you,” Lavrov said. “You know that we as polite people will first communicate this response to our British colleagues.”

On Thursday afternoon, British Prime Minister Theresa May made her first appearance in Salisbury since the attack, speaking there with officials and local residents.

“We do hold Russia culpable for this brazen, brazen act and despicable act that’s taken place on the streets of what is such a remarkable city,” she told the BBC.

Russia has been relatively slow to react to May’s announcement Wednesday that Britain would take action against Russia after Moscow ignored an ultimatum to explain how an alleged Russian nerve agent came to be used on British soil.

Moscow responded to the ultimatum with scorn and sarcasm, ultimately blowing off May’s demands. Meanwhile, officials and pundits in Moscow have issued a steady stream of denials and counterclaims, a tactic that has continued through Thursday.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that President Vladi­mir Putin met with members of his national security council Thursday for a “detailed discussion” on the situation with Britain. “Extreme concern was expressed in connection with the destructive and provocative position taken by the British side,” he said.

Lavrov reiterated earlier comments that the allegations were “boorish and unfounded.” The actions taken by the British “go beyond the limits of elementary rules of decency,” he said, while asserting that Russia has attempted to handle the situation in a civilized manner.

When asked how Britain might respond to any retaliation, British Defense Secretary Gavin Williamson said that Russia “should go away; it should shut up.”

He was taking questions after a speech announcing a $67 million investment in a new chemical weapons defense center.

In Brussels, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg condemned what he said was a “reckless pattern of Russian behavior over many years.” He added the alleged chemical weapons attack to the Kremlin’s ongoing nuclear buildup, military action in Georgia and Ukraine, and the targeting of Western political systems for influence operations.

“We do not want a new Cold War, and we do not want to be dragged into an arms race. An arms race has no winners. It is expensive. It is risky. It is in nobody’s interest,” Stoltenberg said. He said that any response to the chemical attack ought to be “proportionate, measured and defensive.”

Russia has also asked for access to the poison and its victims, 66-year-old Sergei Skripal and his daughter, 33-year-old Yulia Skripal.

They are both reported to be in comas after being found slumped on a park bench in the quiet town of Salisbury, near Stonehenge, on March 4. Skripal, a former Russian double agent, was jailed in Russia in 2006 for selling state secrets to British intelligence for 10 years, but he was released in 2010 as part of a high-profile spy swap.

Despite Russia’s constant and rigorous denials, the United States and France have fallen in behind Britain in support its conclusion that Russia was involved the use of the nerve agent on the Skripals.

“France agrees with the U.K. that there is no other plausible explanation,” President Emmanuel Macron’s office said in a statement following a phone call between Macron and the May.

Macron said France would take measures of its own in coming days against Russia.

British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson called on Britain’s allies to stand united against the nerve-agent attack.

Writing in The Washington Post, he said that “all responsible nations share an obligation to take a principled stance against this behavior,” which he characterized as part of a larger pattern of “reckless behavior” by Putin. The nerve agent, Novichok, was selected for a reason, he said.

“In its blatant Russian-ness, the nerve agent sends a signal to all who may be thinking of dissent in the intensifying repression of Putin’s Russia,” Johnson said. “The message is clear: We will find you, we will catch you, we will kill you — and though we will deny it with lip-curling scorn, the world will know beyond doubt that Russia did it.”

Analysts said that Britain was bracing for a tit-for-tat response from Russia.

“They are not going to take this lying down, and we should expect that. If you’re not prepared to take a few blows, you shouldn’t make any punches. The question is, where does it stop?” said James Nixey, head of the Russia and Eurasia Program at Chatham House, a London-based think tank.

Bodner reported from Moscow. James McAuley in Paris contributed to this report.

The Health 202: Tillerson’s rhetoric didn’t match reality when it came to global health

THE PROGNOSIS

As Rex Tillerson exits the State Department, he leaves behind a confusing trail of mixed messages about whether the Trump administration wants to support or undermine U.S. funding for global health.

President Trump’s tweet yesterday morning that he’d fired Tillerson was sudden yet not surprising given the former oil executive’s fraught year as the country’s top diplomat. Tillerson’s tenure was marked by repeated clashes with the White House, a massive exit of talent from the agency he leads and an extreme reticence to interacting with the media.

Trump didn’t specifically cite Tillerson’s health-care policies as a reason for giving him the boot — the president instead pointed to disagreements in key areas of foreign policy such as the 2015 Iran nuclear deal and the approach to North Korea. But it’s easy to see why the two men were not on the same page when you look at how they approached major U.S. funding streams for priorities such as HIV/AIDS, maternal health and more.

Trump and Tillerson’s rhetoric did at times sounded quite positive toward funding major global-health initiatives. Trump used his first address to the United Nations to brag about U.S. investments in programs to take on AIDS, infectious diseases and human trafficking. And Tillerson occasionally expressed public support for global health programs, for example praising the Bush-era PEPFAR program in a major speech in October.

“PEPFAR has empowered people around the world to take their lives and their counties back,” Tillerson said at the time. “The Trump administration is committed to building on the progress we have already made by accelerating our approach that focuses on the hardest-hit populations.”

But the picture looks different when you consider Trump’s budget requests. The president called for sweeping cuts to virtually every funding stream in his 2018 budget plan last year and in the 2019 version the White House released last month.

The president’s most recent budget requested cuts of 18 percent for PEPFAR, which distributes medical supplies to combat HIV/AIDS in the developing world. The budget document seeks a 32 percent reduction for the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria; a cut of 24 percent for maternal and child health; and a whopping 50 percent slash for family planning and reproductive health.

“There was this rhetorical support, but the proposed cuts were so significant there seemed to be a disconnect,” said Jen Kates, director of global health and HIV policy at the Kaiser Family Foundation.

It’s unclear precisely why the administration has called for such deep cuts to global health aid. For one thing, it’s one area Republicans in Congress are typically eager to fund. Congress routinely allocated even more dollars for global aid than President Barack Obama requested during his two terms. A major hallmark of George W. Bush’s presidency was dramatically expanding AIDS funding through both PEPFAR and the global fund — now the two biggest funding streams for global health initiatives.

There’s another reason the proposed cuts were puzzling. Foreign assistance makes up less than 1 percent of the federal budget, and less than one-fourth of that goes to global health. So trying to trim these programs would do next to nothing to move the needle on U.S. spending, regardless of deficit concerns.

Tillerson didn’t publicly push back against the Trump budget, which would have been unusual for a Cabinet member, anyway. But he provided little evidence that he was making global health any kind of priority for the State Department. Instead, he’ll be best remembered for his effort to reorganize the agency, for which he received much criticism as key positions remained unfilled for months.

“I don’t know that global health was a particular focus for Secretary Tillerson at all,” Thomas Bollyky, senior fellow for global health at the Council on Foreign Relations, told me. “He tended to focus pretty heavily on institutional issues, a big departure from the past.”

The Onion poked fun yesterday:

Morale Low At State Department After Only Employee Fired

A post shared by The Onion (@theonion) on Mar 13, 2018 at 10:01am PDT

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) questioned whether Tillerson’s successor, CIA Director Mike Pompeo, will continue the restructuring: 

There is one way global health programs appeared to be sheltered from the staffing upheaval in Foggy Bottom. Experts say Tillerson left in place or brought on top administrators with strong backgrounds in global health, including Deborah Birx, who oversees PEPFAR, and Mark Green, head of USAID.

But, as with many other areas of Trump’s administration, it’s often hard to figure out the direction or priorities for top Trump appointees. That is how many global health experts said they’ll remember Tillerson.

“Part of the problem is this administration has been inconstant in its support,” said Jeff Sturchio, president of Rabin Martin, a global health consulting firm. “You never know if it’s going to change its tune overnight.”

The president discussing Rex’s departure:

This story, tweeted by the Post’s Ashley Parker, is a good illustration of how Trump treated Tillerson:

Abortion rights groups weren’t pleased Tillerson had enacted new bans on funding for organizations that provide abortions. Planned Parenthood tweeted that CIA Director Mike Pompeo, Trump’s choice to replace Tillerson, likely won’t be any better.

(iStock)

AHH: The panel that advises the White House on cancer policy is calling for immediate action to curb high costs for medications. The President’s Cancer Panel released a report yesterday outlining a series of recommendations  to ensure cancer drugs, which can at times run more than $100,000 per year, are priced according to value. The panel also sought to push cheaper, generic versions of drugs to the market.

“Cancer patients should not have to choose between paying for their medications or paying their mortgages. For so many, it is truly a matter of life and death,” panel chairwoman Barbara Rimer said in a statement. “This is a national imperative that will not be solved by any one sector working alone.”

The report says the complex process that goes into getting a drug to the patient “has resulted in drug prices that often do not reflect the benefits experienced by patients.” “Achieving better alignment could improve the quality of cancer care; create incentives for development of innovative, effective new drugs; and help address increases in drug spending that are threatening to put high-value drugs out of reach for some patients,” it says.

(iStock)

OOF: So exactly why does the United States spend twice as much on health care as other wealthy countries? A new study suggests Americans are using health care at similar rates to other rich countries, and the real difference is in the exorbitant prices of procedures and treatments, The Washington Post’s Carolyn Y. Johnson reports. The finding doesn’t mean Americans aren’t overusing health care — it just means that we aren’t alone in doing so, Carolyn explains.

The sweeping study of health-care expenditures, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, found higher spending in the United States isn’t driven by overuse but by high prices — including doctors’ and nurses’ salaries, hospital charges, pharmaceuticals and administrative overhead. That finding contradicts conventional wisdom. “The thinking goes that the American health care system is uniquely set up to incentivize wasteful imaging scans, oodles of unnecessary prescriptions and procedures that could have been prevented,” Carolyn writes.

The study compared the United States with the United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, Australia, Japan, Sweden, France, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Denmark from 2013 to 2016 on nearly 100 different measures of care. It found the United States spent about twice as much per person on health care, an investment that produced the shortest life spans and the highest rate of infant deaths. 

Veterans Affairs Secretary David Shulkin speaks on Capitol Hill. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File)

OUCH: Will David Shulkin be the next secretary to get fired? Trump is souring on his embattled VA secretary and telling aides he might replace him as part of a broader shakeup of his Cabinet, The Post’s Lisa Rein and Josh Dawsey report. Senior White House officials said Shulkin could be forced out within days and the New York Times has reported the president is considering Energy Secretary Rick Perry, an Air Force veteran, to replace Shulkin. Trump invited Perry to the White House for lunch on Monday but did not formally offer him the job.

“A physician and former hospital executive who won unanimous confirmation by the Senate last year, Shulkin has been a favorite of Trump’s, racking up legislative victories and fast changes at an agency the president railed against on the campaign trail,” Lisa and Josh write. “But months of turmoil in VA’s senior ranks have roiled the ­second-largest federal bureaucracy, which employs 360,000 people. Shulkin has said publicly that high-level political appointees installed by the White House are scheming to oust him over personality and policy differences.”

This file photo shows the Food and Drug Administration campus in Silver Spring, Md. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik, File)

—Yesterday, House lawmakers rejected a “Right to Try” bill that would have allowed seriously ill patients to bypass the FDA to access to experimental treatments. Our colleague Laurie McGInley reports the 259-to-140 vote followed a “spirited debate in which GOP lawmakers portrayed the measure, which was strongly backed by President Trump and Vice President Pence, as a last chance at survival for desperately ill patients.” They also noted dozens of states have passed or introduced similar measures.

But Democrats argued the legislation would weaken critical FDA protections without addressing the fundamental obstacles to experimental drugs. On Monday, more than 75 patient groups sent a letter to House leaders calling for them to reject the bill. The groups, which included the American Cancer Society, Cancer Action Network and the American Lung Association, said it “would not increase access to promising therapies.” The letter said the proposed model would be “less safe” for patients than the existing program, called expanded access.

“The FDA’s expanded-access program, which receives about 1,000 requests a year for experimental drugs, already approves 99 percent of the appeals,” Laurie explained. “But drug companies often balk at providing experimental drugs outside of clinical trials. The right-to-try legislation does not compel pharmaceutical firms to provide sought-after therapies.”

Logos of CVS and Aetna are displayed on a monitor above the floor of the New York Stock Exchange shortly after the opening bell in New York on Dec. 5, 2017. (REUTERS/Lucas Jackson)

—CVS Health and Aetna shareholders have voted to approve the merger between the pharmacy benefits manager and major health insurer. CVS first announced the deal to buy Aetna for $69 billion in December. Yesterday, the two companies held meetings where more than 98 percent of CVS shareholders’ ballots and 97 percent of Aetna shareholders’ ballots were in favor of the deal, CNBC reported. Now it’s up to the Justice Department to approve it.

“When this merger is complete, the combined company will be well-positioned to reshape the consumer health care experience, putting people at the center of health care delivery to ensure they have access to high-quality, more affordable care where they are, when they need it,” CVS Health chief executive Larry Merlo said in a statement.

President Trump delivers remarks to reporters alongside then-HHS Secretary Tom Price and White House counselor Kellyanne Conway. (REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst)

—It appears former HHS Secretary Tom Price has paid back the government for the costs of his jet travel that resulted in his resignation last fall. In a letter raising new questions about travel costs associated with flights White House senior adviser Kellyanne Conway took with Price, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) noted Price had paid the Treasury $60,000 to reimburse costs of his travel.

In his letter to House Oversight Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), Cummings urged Gowdy to subpoena White House documents on Cabinet officials’ pricey travel that includes information on Conway. He wrote that Conway’s travel, as well as costs from another White House official cost taxpayers “tens of thousands of additional dollars.” Cummings’s letter details four trips, including travel in May 2017 for Price, Conway and several staffers totaling more than $44,530, another trip in July totaling more than $14,569 for all passengers and a trip in September.

“To date, the White House has refused to provide any documents at all, including those relating to Ms. Conway’s participation in these trips, whether she intends to repay the taxpayers for the cost of her travel, or whether the President is considering any disciplinary action against her in light of his decision to fire Secretary Price for participating in the same trips,” Cummings writes.

The White House dismissed the letter, saying the “partisan attack on Kellyanne is ridiculous,” per ABC News. Deputy White House press secretary Hogan Gidley added: “Members of the President’s Cabinet invite relevant White House staff for official travel to events advancing the President’s agenda. When White House staff accompany Cabinet Members their travel plans are arranged, secured and financed by the inviting agency.”

–A few more good reads from The Post and beyond:

Today

  • The Senate Indian Affairs Committee holds an oversight hearing on opioids in the Indian community.
  • The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and the American Heart Association hold a briefing on cardiovascular disease.

Coming Up

  • The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee holds a hearing on the 340B Drug Discount Program on Thursday.
  • VA Secretary David Shulkin testifies before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Military Construction, Veterans Affairs and Related Agencies on Thursday.
  • HHS Secretary Alex Azar testifies before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies on Thursday.

Activists laid 7,000 pairs of shoes on the lawn of the U.S. Capitol to represent every young person killed by a gun since the Sandy Hook massacre:

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos calls onCongress to pass gun control legislation “without delay:”

Here’s Stephen Colbert’s take on Trump ousting Secretary of State Rex Tillerson: 

Gun-trained teacher accidentally discharges firearm in Calif. classroom, injuring student

A teacher who is also a reserve police officer trained in firearm use accidentally discharged a gun Tuesday at Seaside High School in Monterey County, Calif., during a class devoted to public safety. A male student was reported to have sustained non-life-threatening injuries.

The weapon, which was not described, was pointed at the ceiling, according to a statement from the school, and debris fell from the ceiling.

Seaside Police Chief Abdul Pridgen told the Monterey County Weekly that a male student was “struck in the neck by ‘debris or fragmentation’ from something overhead.” Pridgen said whatever hit the student was not a bullet.

However, the student’s father, Fermin Gonzales, told KSBW 8 that it was his understanding that fragments from the bullet ricocheted off the ceiling and lodged in the boy’s neck. The father said the teacher told the class before pointing the gun at the ceiling that he was doing so to make sure his gun wasn’t loaded, something that can be determined visually.

“It’s the craziest thing,” Gonzales told the station. “It could have been very bad.”

Gonzales said he learned about the incident when his 17-year-old son came home with blood on his shirt and bullet fragments in his neck.

“He’s shaken up, but he’s going to be okay. I’m just pretty upset that no one told us anything and we had to call the police ourselves to report it,” the father told the TV station.

The teen was treated at a hospital.

The teacher was identified by police as Dennis Alexander, who teaches math as well as a course in the administration of justice. Alexander is a reserve police officer for Sand City and a Seaside city councilman. He could not immediately be reached for comment but he has reportedly apologized for the incident. 

The Monterey County Weekly, quoting Sand City Police Chief Brian Ferrante, reported that Alexander had his last gun safety training less than a year ago. “I have concerns about why he was displaying a loaded firearm in a classroom,” Ferrante told KSBW. “We will be looking into that.”

Exactly why the teacher was displaying the weapon at all was not entirely clear. Police said he was “providing instruction related to public safety.”

The father told KSBW that the teacher was preparing to use the gun to show how to disarm someone.

Daniel “PK” Diffenbaugh, superintendent of the Monterey Peninsula Unified School District, told the Weekly that the incident occurred during the administration of justice class, a career track course offered by the school. “Clearly, we will revisit this incident to ensure that something like this would never happen again.”

Diffenbaugh noted that state law and school policy forbids carrying firearms on campus without authorization. Alexander, he said, was not authorized.

“I think a lot of questions are on parents’ minds are, why a teacher would be pointing a loaded firearm at the ceiling in front of students,” Diffenbaugh told KSBW. “Clearly, in this incident, protocols were not followed.”

The teacher has been placed on administrative leave while an investigation takes place, according to the school. The Sand City Police Department also placed Alexander on administrative leave.

The incident comes amid a national debate on how to protect students from mass shootings like the one that took the lives of 17 people in Parkland, Fla., on Feb. 14. Among the proposals advanced is training and arming teachers, an approach favored by President Trump, among others but opposed by a majority of the teachers in the National Education Association, including many who said in an NEA survey that it would make them feel less safe.

More from Morning Mix:

What made Hawking’s ‘A Brief History of Time’ so immensely popular?

Stephen Hawking’s secret to surviving his terrible condition? A sense of humor.

Fox News sued by parents of Seth Rich, slain DNC staffer, over conspiracy theory about his death

For Xavier Becerra, California’s attorney general, the fight with Trump is personal

Stephen Hawking: The book that made him a star

Image copyright
Getty Images

Stephen Hawking was the most remarkable author I had the privilege of working with during my career as the director of science publishing at Cambridge University Press.

In 1982, I had responsibility for his third academic book for the Press, Superspace And Supergravity.

This was a messy collection of papers from a technical workshop on how to devise a new theory of gravity.

While that book was in production, I suggested he try something easier: a popular book about the nature of the Universe, suitable for the general market.

Stephen mulled over my suggestion.

He already had an international reputation as a brilliant theoretical physicist working on rotating black holes and theories of gravity.

And he had concerns about financial matters: importantly, it was impossible for him to obtain any form of life insurance to protect his family in the event of his death or becoming total dependent on nursing care.

So, he took precious time out from his research to prepare the rough draft of a book.

Image caption

Ten million copies in all editions and translations

At the time, several bestselling physics authors had already published non-technical books on the early Universe and black holes.

Stephen decided to write a more personal approach, by explaining his own research in cosmology and quantum theory.

As he himself pointed out it, his area of interest had “become so technical that only a very small number of specialists could master the mathematics” used to describe it.

For a starting point, he took some themes from a course of advanced lectures that he had recently given at Harvard University.

These had catchy titles such as “The edge of spacetime”, “Black holes and thermodynamics”, and “Quantum gravity”.

In the 1980s, my office and Stephen’s were in the same courtyard in central Cambridge, so I often chatted with him about publishing.

One afternoon he invited me to take a look at the first draft, but first he wanted to discuss cash.

He told me he had spent considerable time away from his research, and that he expected advances and royalties to be large.

When I pressed him on the market that he foresaw, he insisted that it had to be on sale, up front, at all airport bookshops in the UK and the US.

I told that was a tough call for a university press.

Then I thumbed the typescript. To my dismay, the text was far too technical for a general reader.

A few weeks later he showed me a revision, much improved, but still littered with equations.

I said: “Steve, it’s still too technical – every equation will halve the market.”

He eventually removed all except one, E = mc². And he decided, fortunately, to place it with a mass market publisher rather than a university press.

Bantam published A Brief History of Time in March 1988.

Sales took off like a rocket, and it ranked as a bestseller for at least five years.

Total sales approached 10 million copies.

The book’s impact on the popularisation of science has been incalculable.

Stephen was an inspirational ambassador for the power of science to provide rational accounts of the physical laws governing the natural world.

Simon Mitton is a historian of science at the University of Cambridge