Tag Archives: air travel

Pack your patience: AMA offers tips on holiday air travel

The holidays can be one of the busiest times to fly in and out of the Grande Prairie Airport. Because of that, the Alberta Motor Association has offered some tips on how to make travel as smooth as possible. AMA Members Services Manager Roland VanMeurs says that when it comes to holiday air travel, patience is key.

“The number one thing you have to make sure you have is patience… Depending on what mother nature decides to do with us during that time period, sometimes you can see delays and sometimes it runs smooth but patience is definitely something you have to have.”

Other tips include; doing as much as possible in advance, such as check-in and seat selection, making sure all liquids, gels and sharp items are packed in checked bags, cross pack items with other travellers in your group in case one person’s luggage goes missing and make sure you have valid documentation on you at all times.

When it comes to travelling with presents, VanMeurs says it’s best to keep them unwrapped.

“Don’t wrap them. Make sure you wrap them when you get to your destination because if they do want to see what’s in it, that wrapping paper will come off.”

VanMeurs also says that if you have small gifts worth a lot of money, pack those in your carry on as long as it’s not a liquid or sharp item. Other larger gifts should be checked in your suitcase.

India witnessing double digit air travel growth for 50 months in a row: IATA

Refrain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks, name calling or inciting hatred against any community. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines by marking them offensive. Let’s work together to keep the conversation civil.

HIDE

Bernie Sanders Spent Hundreds of Thousands on Private Air Travel in October

As one of the central issues of his 2016 presidential campaign, Sen. Bernie Sanders has referred to climate change as the “single greatest threat facing our planet.” It’s surprising, then, that the man so ostensibly concerned about burning fossil fuels spent nearly $300,000 on private air travel in just one month.

According to multiple reports, Sanders traveled to nine battleground states in October ahead of the midterm elections.

Sanders’ 2018 campaign committee issued an Oct. 10 payment of $297,685 to New York-based Apollo Jets, a charter jet company used by retired sports stars Derek Jeter and Shaquille O’Neal, according to federal campaign reports obtained by VTDigger.org, a watchdog news site in Vermont.

“This expense was for transportation for the senator’s nine-day, nine-state tour to support Democratic candidates up and down the ballot ahead of Election Day,” said Arianna Jones, senior communications adviser for Friends of Bernie Sanders.

“This cost covered the entirety of the tour from Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa, South Carolina, Colorado, Nevada, Arizona, California, and back to Vermont,” Jones continued. “The senator participated in 25 events.”

Jones said the charter jets were necessary so Sanders could campaign for candidates and get back to Vermont to join the state Democratic Party’s campaign efforts. (FoxNews.com)

“Climate change is a planetary crisis. Our task is clear. We must take on the fossil fuel industry that’s largely responsible for global emissions and accelerate our transition toward energy efficiency and sustainable energy sources,” Sanders tweeted the same day the payment to Apollo Jets was made.

Jones told The Daily Caller that carbon offsets were purchased from NativeEnergy in response “to support renewable energy projects and invest in carbon reduction projects to balance out the emissions produced on the trip.” 

Timelapse map reveals busiest places for air travel over Christmas

If Christmas travel chaos does your head in, best not look at this timelapse map of the flights set to take to the skies this festive season. 

Nearly 70 million people around the world will catch nearly half a million flights between December 21 and 25, according to the map, created by the UK’s Buyagift using data from air travel intelligence company OAG Aviation. 

December 23 (Christmas Eve eve) is set to be the busiest day for air travel, with more than 15 million people catching nearly 100,000 flights.    

Christmas Eve will be almost as hectic with 13.8 million travellers, while 13.3 million are set to fly out on December 21. More than 12.5 million will take off on Christmas Day itself. 

READ MORE:
* Ed Sheeran caught up in Rhys Darby’s quest to get NZ back on the map
* Air travel record: Flight tracker monitors busiest day ever for flights
* Kiwi humour lauded after hilarious video about NZ disappearing off world maps

The US is set to be the busiest country for air travel over the period with 118,071 departures and 118,844 arrivals. 

China sits in second place with 53,704 departures and 52,037 arrivals. 

They are followed by India, Indonesia, Canada, Japan and Brazil. If you hate travelling when it’s busy, don’t worry: New Zealand doesn’t make the top 10.

The busiest cities will be New York, Chicago, London, Atlanta, Dallas and Shanghai, followed by Moscow, Paris, Bangkok and Los Angeles. 

Chicago O’Hare International is set to be the busiest airport, followed by Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson, Los Angeles International and Dallas, Denver, Beijing, Jakarta, Charlotte, Houston, Delhi and New York’s JFK airports.   

Disappointingly, flights to and from New Zealand are not shown on the map.

Seems PM Jacinda Ardern and Rhys Darby still have work to do on their #getnewzealandonthemap campaign

News report: Air travel cost for Trump’s MT campaign visits nearly $3M – KPAX

HELENA – The air-travel cost for President Trump’s four campaign visits to Montana this year was nearly $3 million – and that doesn’t include other costs like the Secret Service and support personnel, a news website reported this week.

The website Quartz, which examined Department of Defense figures for the use of Air Force One, said the president’s air travel to more than 40 campaign rallies in support of Republican candidates this year cost about $17 million.

Air travel for his four trips to Montana totaled $2.9 million – including $1.2 million for his July 5 trip to Great Falls, the second-most expensive of his campaign flights, Quartz reported.

He also visited Billings, Missoula and Bozeman, primarily to campaign for Republican U.S. Senate candidate Matt Rosendale, who lost to Democratic U.S. Sen. Jon Tester.

It’s unclear how much of those costs are picked up by the taxpayer. So far, the president’s re-election campaign has not reported paying for any specific expenses in Montana.

A spokesman for the Federal Election Commission said if the president’s campaign incurs those costs, they should be reported.

Trump’s 2020 re-election campaign set up the rallies in Montana and elsewhere, to support Republican candidates.

The president’s re-election campaign’s latest report, which covers activity from July through September, listed zero expenses for Montana, out of the $7.7 million spent by the campaign. Trump visited Great Falls in July and Billings in September.

President Donald Trump addressing supporters during a rally in Great Falls. (MTN News photo)

The Trump re-election campaign didn’t respond to questions about whether or how it is reporting the rally expenses.

Trump flew to the Montana rallies aboard Air Force One, the president’s official airplane.

Quartz said the Trump campaign reported $113,000 in “travel expenses: air” in March and April.

The report said the air-travel expense of the other Montana trips was $952,000 for flying to Missoula, $575,000 for the Billings trip, and $122,000 for the Bozeman trip, which was one of two stops for the president that day.

 — Story by Mike Dennison – MTN News

Bernie Sanders spent nearly $300G on private air travel in October: reports

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., speaks at a George Washington University in an undated photo.
(Associated Press)

Bernie Sanders is so concerned about climate change that he spent nearly $300,000 on private air travel in October so he could speak to audiences in nine battleground states prior to November’s midterm elections.

The independent U.S. senator from Vermont also used the opportunity to test the waters for a potential 2020 presidential run, according to reports.

Sanders’ 2018 campaign committee issued an Oct. 10 payment of $297,685 to New York-based Apollo Jets, a charter jet company used by retired sports stars Derek Jeter and Shaquille O’Neal, according to federal campaign reports obtained by VTDigger.org, a watchdog news site in Vermont.

“This expense was for transportation for the senator’s nine-day, nine-state tour to support Democratic candidates up and down the ballot ahead of Election Day,” said Arianna Jones, senior communications adviser for Friends of Bernie Sanders.

“This cost covered the entirety of the tour from Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa, South Carolina, Colorado, Nevada, Arizona, California, and back to Vermont,” Jones continued. “The senator participated in 25 events.”

Video

Jones said the charter jets were necessary so Sanders could campaign for candidates and get back to Vermont to join the state Democratic Party’s campaign efforts.

The Sanders campaign purchased nearly $5,000 in carbon offsets to balance out the emissions produced from the travel. A carbon offset is a reduction in emissions to compensate for emissions elsewhere.

Sanders has been vocal about the need to curb the effects of climate change, calling it the “single greatest threat facing our planet.”

The same day his campaign paid Apollo Jets, Sanders called climate change a “planetary crisis” in a tweet.

“Climate change is a planetary crisis. Our task is clear. We must take on the fossil fuel industry that’s largely responsible for global emissions and accelerate our transition toward energy efficiency and sustainable energy sources,” Sanders wrote.

“He wanted to go where he thinks he can be helpful in energizing the base and bringing in young people and independent voters and working-class voters who supported him,” said Jeff Weaver, Sanders’ 2016 campaign manager and longtime political adviser.

The campaign also paid $13,500 to Virginia-based travel agency Metropolitan Travel at the end of September.

In July 2017, the Sanders campaign paid $37,567 to Apollo Jets, the Washington Free Beacon reported.

During the 2016 presidential election, Sanders spent $5.2 million on private jet services in a six-month period from the end of 2015 to mid-2016.

Supersonic commercial air travel may return — without all the noise

Earlier this year, NASA awarded $250,000 to Lockheed Martin to create an aircraft capable of silently breaking the sound barrier (“Low-Boom flight program”).

On Nov. 16, the company

LMT, -3.39%

  started production of the experimental QueSST (Quiet SuperSonic Transport) aircraft. This elegant vehicle can cruise at Mach 1.42 (1,510 km/h or 940 mph) and is capable of reaching 55,000 feet (16,800 meters), creating a low 75 Perceived Level decibel (PLdB) thump. This means that when the airplane breaks the sound barrier, it creates noise equivalent to the sound of slamming the car door.

In contrast, conventional supersonic jets generate booms powerful enough to startle or awaken people, or cause minor damage to some structures. Although passengers can’t hear the sound, those on land can, as it is generated behind the jet. This led to the prohibition of routine supersonic flights over land.

SNAPPA

Furthermore, these jets had to fly at higher altitudes, which caused further problems, such as increased radiation exposure, and even increased risk of cabin depressurization to both passengers and the crew compared to subsonic airliners.

The last Concorde flew in November 2003. Business had been hit by the slump in air travel following the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on the U.S. as well as rising maintenance costs. Furthermore, the aircraft was built for speed and not for comfort; its narrow fuselage wasn’t wide enough to allow for reclining seats or anything more than minimal moving space.

Getty Images

A British Airways Concorde passenger jet lands on Nov. 5, 2003 at Boeing Field in Seattle.

Now, 15 years later, QueSST could usher in a new era of commercial supersonic aircraft. Its shape is as slender and sleek as its predecessor’s, but unlike the Concorde, its low-boom features could allow it to fly over land. Test flights over U.S. cities will be conducted in 2021, at which time NASA will reach out to regulators, hoping they will lift the ban — at least for this aircraft. If it succeeds, this could revolutionize commercial cargo and passenger markets.

How so? Well, subsonic jets take around eight hours to fly from New York to Paris, while QueSST would make that trip in a little less than 4 hours.

The question remains, though, whether NASA’s experimental jet overcome Concorde’s other shortcomings. We have yet to see any footage showing the airplane’s interior, but some conclusions can already be drawn from the shape of the plane. With fewer passengers and more expensive tickets, this type of flight service could find its way into the market, while keeping a sufficient level of comfort and luxury to justify the purchase.

Jurica Dujmovic is a business publisher, consultant,
designer and gamer.

We Want to
Hear from You

What do you think about the commercial viability of supersonic commercial flights?

White man rants about Spanish-speaking workers in Fresh Kitchen

A racist and ranting white customer threatened to call federal immigration officials on workers at a Midtown restaurant — because they spoke in Spanish.

A viral video of the Tuesday lunchtime explosion captured the condescending patron declaring the employees were in “my country” before ripping into the manager of the Fresh Kitchen on Madison Ave.

“Your staff is speaking Spanish to customers when they should be speaking English,” the man announces. “Every person I listened to — he spoke it, he spoke it, she’s speaking it.

“This is America. Your staff should be speaking English, OK?”

The fuming man then informed the manager that he planned to follow up by contacting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for a possible raid on the restaurant.

“My guess is they’re not documented,” he announces loudly. “So my next call is to ICE to have each one of them kicked out of my country. If they have the b—s to come here and live off my money?

“I pay for their welfare, I pay for their ability to be here. The least they can do is speak English.”

The manager told the Daily News that the unidentified customer, clutching a cell phone in one hand, completely misread the situation.

A lunchtime regular was speaking Spanish with a Hispanic employee as they did most days when the man began his diatribe.

“They were speaking Spanish because they are friends,” the manager said. “He got mad, waiting in line for his food. He stormed out.”

The manager said he was infuriated by the customer’s remarks but refused to respond in a similar fashion.

“He’s a customer, so I had to stay professional and ask him to leave,” the manager said. “That’s what I did.”

RELATED: The faces of Trump’s immigration crackdown: 

Up Next

See Gallery




Trump voters warn him not to fire Mueller: ‘People would be suspicious’

They see the Russia investigation as President Trump does, as a witch hunt that has expanded far beyond its initial mandate with the explicit aim of delegitimizing or perhaps even overturning his 2016 election victory.

Yet these most steadfast of Trump supporters, who were among those gathered here Tuesday night as part of a focus group evaluating public opinion, said the president should not fire special counsel Robert S. Mueller III, a view shared by the Trump critics around the table.

“People would be suspicious,” said Betsy Novak, 55, a greenhouse worker who voted for Trump.

“It [would be] hiding something,” said Curt Hetzel, 48, a shipping and receiving manager who also voted for Trump.

“Politically, it would be a terrible idea,” said yet another Trump backer, Sam Goldner, 25, a warehouse manager.

These three were among the 12 men and women assembled for a two-hour focus group in this Milwaukee suburb, a perennial suburban swing area in a state that helped propel Trump to a surprise victory and is home to competitive Senate and gubernatorial contests this fall.

The opinions voiced here Tuesday night about Trump’s governing record and conduct in office — as well as the intensifying Mueller investigation — largely split along party lines, a vivid illustration of the deep divides across the country ahead of the November midterm elections.

“Partisan America is alive and well in Wisconsin,” Peter D. Hart, a longtime Democratic pollster who led the focus group here on behalf of Emory University, said in reflection. “I felt that people are pretty frozen in place. The one thing they agreed with was Robert Mueller should not be fired. That’s about as close as they get to a unified position.”

The dozen people were selected as part of Emory University’s “Dialogue with America” focus group series because of their diverse backgrounds and because they make up a cross-section of political attitudes, though their statements are not a scientific representation of overall opinion.

Asked to name their favorite president in their lifetimes, half said Ronald Reagan, three said Barack Obama and one each said Trump, Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter.

Overall, they were pessimistic about the state of the country as Trump nears 500 days in office, with all but two saying the nation was more divided than it is united. They overwhelmingly used negative words to describe America today: “Frenetic,” “bad,” “tense,” “chaotic,” “uncivil” and “indecisive.”

“We’re constantly battling,” said Michael Ross, 36, a judicial assistant who supported Hillary Clinton over Trump.

Though the group was quick to give Trump credit for the steady economy, job growth and changes to the tax code, they also blamed the president for a host of national ailments — from racial unrest to a decline in credibility and an intentional blurring of the truth by disputing facts.

All 12 of the assembled voters said they were following news about the Mueller probe, and their views of the special counsel were colored by their feelings about the president. Those who oppose Trump described Mueller as “intelligent,” “respected,” “smart,” “diligent” and “unstoppable.” But Trump’s supporters called the former Marine Corps captain and FBI director “unethical,” “desperate,” “partisan” and “a liar.”

Meredith Legree, 36, a physician assistant who voted for Trump, said, “This investigation’s ongoing because people aren’t happy that Trump is in power and they’re looking for any way to get him out.”

But Michelle Price, 52, a medical research assistant who voted for Clinton, said Mueller must keep following the facts. Of Trump, she said, “his character is making me believe that [collusion] did happen. I want them to keep investigating and let me know for sure.”

Added Atanu Deb Baruah, 48, a marketing director who also backed Clinton, “Let the investigators continue. Let them do their job. Let’s not try to obstruct.”

Trump’s opponents delivered even scathing assessments, indicating that the president has significant work to do to expand his base of support. Two people called him “untrustworthy,” and others said he was “immoral,” “not credible,” a “liar” and “disgusting.”

Why disgusting?

“I have a daughter,” said Steven Midthun, 54, a public schools librarian who voted for Clinton.

But Trump’s backers said they saw the president as a bold innovator who has been misrepresented by the media.

“He’s not given a fair shot,” Novak said.

The focus group participants spoke with particular disdain for leaders in Congress. Asked to assess House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.), who represents a nearby district and is retiring at the end of the year, they were lukewarm, describing him as “a good person” and “smart” but “not the right personality for the job” and “done.”

Asked about House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who could succeed Ryan as speaker should Democrats retake the House majority, 10 of the 12 people used negative descriptions. She was described as “hyperbolic” and “unethical,” and five people said she was either “too old,” “done” or “time to retire.”

Some of the Trump backers showed flashes of dissatisfaction with the president. Asked to describe him in one word, Hetzel chose “egotistical,” explaining, “He’s so used to just getting his way.”

Hetzel and other Trump backers agreed that their biggest disappointment in the president has been his tweets and decisions to engage on what they see as petty issues.

“It’s almost childish,” Hetzel said. “You’re a 70-something-year-old man and you’re president of the United States. You should be a little more mature and pick better subjects to be tweeting about.”

Another supporter of the president, Randy Cera, said Trump’s tweets make him vulnerable in the media.

“The tweets are fuel for the fire,” said Cera, 52, an insurance agent. “It helps validate the negativity.”

Despite their misgivings, however, these voters exhibited loyalty to Trump — going so far as to continue the president’s personal feud with Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), even as he is at home battling brain cancer. McCain has tangled with Trump and opposed high-profile administration priorities, and this past week the White House has refused to apologize for communications aide Kelly Sadler joking in an internal meeting about McCain being irrelevant because “he’s dying anyway.”

While other focus group participants called McCain heroic or strong or patriotic, Cera said the Arizona senator was “petty.” And Stephen Rozmenoski, 66, a machinist, labeled him a “turncoat,” presumably because of his vote against the Republican health-care bill last year, for which Trump repeatedly has attacked McCain.

“If anybody has a doubt about how solid the Trump core is, come listen to this group,” Hart said. “They couldn’t even find a nice word to say about John McCain.”

North Korean Threats Are ‘Splash of Cold Water’ on Expectations for Talks

The press secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, was hardly more forthcoming.

“If they want to meet, we’ll be ready,” she told reporters on Wednesday, “and if they don’t, that’s O.K., too.” She said the White House “fully expected” North Korea to take this tack — an assertion belied by the scrambling of officials when the first reports came in from Pyongyang on Tuesday evening.

Other officials, however, insisted that they were taking North Korea’s warnings in stride, noting that Mr. Kim, not Mr. Trump, had sought the meeting. They said they expected the North to maneuver for tactical advantage until the two leaders met on June 12.

People close to the White House said the scattershot nature of the messages on North Korea reflected the newness of the president’s national security team, but also the fact that Mr. Trump was distracted by the swirl of legal issues around him, from the Russia investigation to the payments made by his personal lawyer, Michael D. Cohen, to a pornographic film actress.

Some suggested that Mr. Trump needed to rein in Mr. Bolton — a point the North Korean official, Mr. Kim, appeared to be making in his statement. He rejected Mr. Bolton’s reference to Libya as a template for North Korea, saying that the “world knows too well that our country is neither Libya nor Iraq, which have met miserable fates.”

If Pyongyang’s statements caught Washington and Seoul off guard, they reflected a well-established North Korean position: that it is only willing to negotiate with the United States as a fellow nuclear power.

By referring to itself as a “nuclear weapon state,” North Korea was not only distinguishing itself from Libya or Iraq, it was also potentially signaling that the North is seeking an arms control agreement, not disarmament. Under such an arrangement, analysts said, North Korea would be treated like the Soviet Union and later Russia, which were asked to limit, rather than eliminate, their arsenals.