Congressional investigators believe they are barely beginning to answer the questions raised by the text messages between the FBI’s Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. For several reasons:

1) Strzok and Page were more prolific texters than anyone knew. In a statement late Monday, Attorney General Jeff Sessions said FBI investigators have found “over 50,000 texts” in their review of Strzok-Page communications.

2) Even with all those texts, the FBI says it cannot find the couple’s messages between Dec. 14, 2016, and May 17, 2017 — a critical time in the Trump-Russia affair. It’s probably safe to say there is not a single Republican on Capitol Hill who does not view this as a fishy set of circumstances and does not believe Congress should step up its investigation.

3) Strzok and Page didn’t just text each other on their FBI-issued Samsung phones. At times in the text exchanges that have been released, either Strzok or Page suggested that they switch over to iMessage — suggesting they might have used personal, Apple phones to communicate about FBI business in addition to their bureau-provided phones. In a letter to the Justice Department Saturday, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., asked whether the FBI had “conducted searches of Mr. Strzok’s and Ms. Page’s non-FBI-issued communications devices or accounts.”

4) Strzok and Page emailed each other on Gmail. Johnson’s letter noted a Nov. 10, 2016, text from Page to Strzok that said: “Hey without thinking I replied to the email you sent me on Gmail. But it went to your Verizon. So please clear. Let me know if you want me to send it again somewhere else.” On Oct. 4, 2015, Johnson noted, Strzok texted Page to say, “It’s going to be ok at work. And haven’t emailed you here, although I just did on gmail.” Look for Congress to get in touch with Google in an attempt to see those emails.

5) The texts are filled with cryptic messages. Strzok and Page communicated in a sort of shorthand that was heavy on gossip and filled with references to whatever was happening in the office on any particular day. Amid that, there were many passages that might refer to the presidential race and the Trump-Russia investigation. The latest to catch Republican eyes is the “secret society” text from the day after the 2016 election. “There is a text exchange between these two FBI agents, these supposed-to-be fact-centric FBI agents saying, ‘Perhaps this is the first meeting of the secret society,'” noted Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., on Fox News Monday night. But nobody knows if “secret society” represents something important to the investigation or something entirely innocent. Republicans might be on to something, or they might be mistaken.

In his statement Monday, an apologetic-sounding Sessions vowed to “leave no stone unturned” in searching for the missing texts. The Justice Department will “use every technology available to determine whether the missing messages are recoverable from another source,” Sessions said. “A review is already underway to ascertain what occurred and to determine if these records can be recovered in any other way. If any wrongdoing were to be found to have caused this gap, appropriate legal disciplinary action measures will be taken.”

A skeptical and suspicious Congress is waiting to see what Sessions finds.