Category Archives: Latest News

The Latest: Official: Spain won’t accept Catalan declaration

In a long-awaited speech, Catalan regional president Carles Puigdemont affirmed on Tuesday the right of Catalonia to be an independent country. But he notably stopped short of declaring the region an independent polity, calling for further dialogue with the Spanish government.

By suspending the secession process, Puigdemont opened the door to critics and observers in Spain and across the European Union who feared the rise of separatism in the increasingly embattled 28-state bloc. He said that Catalonia’s conflict with Spain could be resolved in a rational way and suggested exploring international mediation as a possible solution.

Earlier on Tuesday, the Spanish government rejected any offer of negotiation.

All throughout a long and often bitter process, Madrid fiercely rejected the prospect of Catalan independence, deploying police to interrupt the vote in violent clashes and threatening to throw Puigdemont in jail if he went any further. Spain’s constitution court had ruled Catalonia’s referendum illegal, and although a majority voted to leave Spain, fewer than 50 percent of Catalan residents ultimately cast ballots.

Following Puigdemont’s remarks, a Spanish government official, speaking to the Spanish news agency EFE, reaffirmed on Tuesday evening the illegality of the Catalan referendum and that “the claimed results of a fraudulent and illegal referendum cannot be taken as valid either.” The Spanish government has not yet made an official response.

Puigdemont’s address, delivered more than a week after the referendum, is likely to resolve little in an escalating conflict that has shocked observers worldwide.

In a move that some commentators said was intended to please both sides, he presented Catalan independence as an inevitability, but delayed the prospect of independence to allow room for further discussion with Spanish and European officials.

“I want to follow the people’s will for Catalonia to become an independent state,” he said. But Puigdemont also said that by suspending the independence process, “we are making a gesture of responsibility in favor of dialogue.”

Following the referendum, European leaders had warned Catalan authorities not to make a rash decision that would preclude any negotiations with an angry Madrid.

Earlier on Tuesday, Donald Tusk, president of the European Council, addressed Puigdemont directly, urging him not to go through with independence in a strongly worded statement.

“A few days ago I asked Prime Minister [Mariano] Rajoy to look for a solution to the problem without the use of force, to look for dialogue, because the force of argument is always better than the argument of force,” Tusk said. “Today I ask you to respect in your intentions the constitutional order and not to announce a decision that would make such a dialogue impossible.”

Puigdemont’s remarks suggest that he heeded those exhortations, but his political opponents were quick to pounce on the potential for a future crisis they still see as imminent.

“No one in Europe is going to accept a declaration of independence whether it be deferred, delayed or in phases,” said Ines Arrimadas, a leader of the Citizens Party, who gave the first response to Puigdemont’s speech in the Catalan Parliament on Tuesday evening.

“This was never about democracy. This was always about independence,” she said. “It wasn’t about polls. It was about nationalism. Nationalism is the antithesis of the project that is Europe. You are in the wrong place and century.”

Others, particularly some among his allies, expressed disappointment and outrage that Puigdemont did not go further with pushing for immediate independence.

Barcelona’s city government estimated that approximately 30,000 people were crowded near the parliament building, awaiting the contents of the speech. Many erupted in cheers as Puigdemont said he “assumed the mandate” for an independent Catalonia but soon fell silent when he then said that secession would be suspended. Some whistled their disapproval.

“We thought that what was going to happen was the solemn declaration of independence of the Catalan Republic,” said Anna Gabriel, a leader of the far-left anarchist CUP party that partners with Puigdemont’s party to form a fragile pro-independence coalition. “We believed that that is what today was about and that maybe we have missed the chance.”

Puigdemont’s remarks, postponed an hour due to what Spanish media claimed were 11th-hour negotiations, did not address the large or small logistical concerns that independence would present.

For one, European officials have suggested that Catalonia would not be automatically welcomed into the European Union and would need to apply. On a more local level, French officials, in allegiance with Spain, have said they would not consider a newly formed state a legal entity. Nathalie Loiseau, France’s minister of European affairs, said Monday that France would not recognize an independent Catalonia on its borders — a move that could leave the region isolated and vulnerable.

“If there were to be a declaration of independence, it would be unilateral, and it would not be recognized,” she said.

Catalonia, which prides itself on being the wealthiest region in Spain, is now also facing a mass exodus by some of the biggest companies based in its capital, Barcelona.

Conglomerates such as Colonial, Abertis and Cellnex all joined the banks Sabadell and Caixabank and energy company Gas Natural to switch fiscal headquarters to Madrid or other Spanish cities in advance of a possible declaration of independence.

In all, at least 11 publicly listed companies worth approximately more than $80 billion have changed their fiscal addresses in the past week. Pharmaceutical Grifols is the only company from the Ibex-35 exchange still based in Barcelona, but there are rumors that it, too, could move.

In a symbolic gesture, the president of the Catalan sparkling wine company Freixenet, long identified as a symbol of the region’s heritage and international appeal, said he would ask the board to move its headquarters out of Catalonia should independence be announced.

These concerns seemed to trouble even some of Puigdemont’s allies.

The lack of an independent border force, for instance, was among the concerns voiced by Artur Mas, Catalonia’s former president and current leader of the region’s governing, pro-separation Catalan European Democratic Party.

In an interview with the Financial Times on Friday, Mas said that while Catalonia has “won the right to become an independent state,” it was not yet ready for “real independence.”

Among Mas’s principal concerns were issues such as border control, tax collection and a functioning judicial system independent from Madrid — none of which Catalonia can currently claim.

In remarks that fanned the flames of outrage in Catalonia, a spokesman for Spain’s center-right ruling party warned that Puigdemont could face jail time if he declares independence.

Specifically, the spokesman said, he might “end up” like the previous Catalan president who proclaimed independence in 1934: Lluís Companys, who was imprisoned and ultimately executed by firing squad in 1940 by the regime of dictator Francisco Franco.

Rajoy, Spain’s prime minister, has refused to budge. Should the region attempt to secede from Spain, he said, Madrid is ready to suspend Catalonia’s regional government and demand new elections.

In his speech, Puidgemont suggested that secession proceedings could formally begin in as soon as “a few weeks.”

McAuley reported from Paris. Brian Murphy in Washington contributed to this report.

Read more:

Trump proposes ‘IQ tests’ faceoff with Tillerson after secretary of state calls him a ‘moron’


Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, right, listens as President Trump speaks at a luncheon during the U.N. General Assembly on Sept. 21 in New York. (Evan Vucci/AP)

President Trump proposed an “IQ tests” faceoff with Secretary of State Rex Tillerson after the nation’s top diplomat reportedly called the president a “moron” and disparaged his grasp of foreign policy.

In an interview with Forbes magazine published Tuesday, Trump fired a shot at Tillerson over the “moron” revelation, first reported by NBC News and confirmed by several other news organizations, including The Washington Post.

“I think it’s fake news,” Trump said, “but if he did that, I guess we’ll have to compare IQ tests. And I can tell you who is going to win.”

Trump met for lunch Tuesday with Tillerson and Defense Secretary Jim Mattis in the president’s private dining room at the White House. Shortly before the lunch, a reporter asked Trump whether he had undercut Tillerson with his comments to Forbes.

“No, I didn’t undercut anybody. I don’t believe in undercutting people,” Trump said during a brief media appearance in the Oval Office, as he sat beside former secretary of state Henry Kissinger during a meeting to discuss foreign affairs.

When a reporter asked Trump whether he has confidence in Tillerson as his secretary of state, the president replied, “Yes.”

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders later said that Trump’s “IQ tests” comment to Forbes was “a joke and nothing more than that.”

“The president certainly never implied that the secretary of state was not incredibly intelligent,” Sanders said in Tuesday afternoon’s news briefing. She added that Trump has “100 percent confidence” in Tillerson, characterized their lunch as “a great visit” and admonished reporters for taking the president’s comment so seriously. “Maybe you guys should get a sense of humor and try it sometime,” Sanders said.

Trump’s “IQ tests” challenge is the latest evidence of what White House officials have described as a breach of trust between the president and the secretary of state.

Reporters asked Trump over the weekend about his relationship with Tillerson.

“We have a very good relationship,” Trump said Saturday. “We disagree on a couple of things. Sometimes I’d like him to be a little bit tougher. But other than that, we have a very good relationship.”

In the Forbes interview, for the magazine’s cover story under the headline “Inside Trump’s Head,” the president teases upcoming economic-development legislation “nobody knows about” that would penalize companies that move operations overseas, and offer incentives for those that stay in the United States.

Trump previewed what he called “an economic-development bill, which I think will be fantastic. Which nobody knows about. Which you are hearing about for the first time.” The president said the policy is “both a carrot and a stick.”

Trump also told Forbes that he has purposefully not filled many jobs throughout the federal government, including at the State Department, where many of the top positions remain vacant.

“I’m generally not going to make a lot of the appointments that would normally be — because you don’t need them,” Trump said. “I mean, you look at some of these agencies, how massive they are, and it’s totally unnecessary. They have hundreds of thousands of people.”

Judi Dench, Glenn Close and Meryl Streep Speak Out on Harvey Weinstein

I’m sitting here, deeply upset, acknowledging to myself that, yes, for many years, I have been aware of the vague rumors that Harvey Weinstein had a pattern of behaving inappropriately around women. Harvey has always been decent to me, but now that the rumors are being substantiated, I feel angry and darkly sad.

I’m angry, not just at him and the conspiracy of silence around his actions, but also that the “casting couch” phenomenon, so to speak, is still a reality in our business and in the world: the horrible pressure, the awful expectation put on a woman when a powerful, egotistical, entitled bully expects sexual favors in exchange for a job.

Ours is an industry in which very few actors are indispensable and women are cast in far fewer roles than men, so the stakes are higher for women and make them more vulnerable to the manipulations of a predator. I applaud the monumental courage of the women who have spoken up. I hope that their stories and the reportage that gave them their voices represents a tipping point, that more stories will be told and that change will follow.

The changes must be both institutional and personal. Men and women, in positions of power, must create a work environment in which people, whose jobs depend on them, feel safe to report threatening and inappropriate behavior, like that reported in the Times. No one should be coerced into trading personal dignity for professional success. I feel the time is long and tragically overdue for all of us in the industry, women and men, to unite — calmly and dispassionately — and create a new culture of respect, equality and empowerment, where bullies and their enablers are no longer allowed to prosper.

Five things to know about Trump’s immigration principles

The White House is putting a high price on any deal that would allow young immigrants who entered the United States illegally to stay in the country and work.

In exchange for legislation that would turn the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program into law, the Trump administration wants money for the president’s proposed border wall, sweeping border security measures, crackdowns on so-called “sanctuary cities” and new measures to curb the number of unaccompanied minors crossing the southern border.

Democrats are unlikely to agree to the set of demands, raising real questions about the path forward for DACA, the Obama-era program Trump began to wind down last month. 

Here are five things to know about the White House’s proposal: 

Dead on arrival? 

The White House demands were quickly condemned by Democrats.

Sen. Charles SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis SchumerOvernight Health Care: Schumer calls for tying ObamaCare fix to children’s health insurance | Puerto Rico’s water woes worsen | Dems plead for nursing home residents’ right to sue Crying on TV doesn’t qualify Kimmel to set nation’s gun agenda Trump knocks ‘fake’ news coverage of his trip to Puerto Rico MORE (N.Y.) and Rep. Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), the top Democrats in the Senate and House, were particularly irked that the proposal included several so-called poison pills that were not a part of last month’s talks with Trump — especially the border wall funding. 

“This list goes so far beyond what is reasonable,” the two leaders said in a joint statement. 

It also has the potential to divide Republicans, who could balk at cuts to legal immigration that were included in the plan. GOP lawmakers from border states are also skeptical of Trump’s proposal to build a wall between the U.S. and Mexico. 

Advocates on both sides of the immigration debate expressed pessimism that a deal could be reached, but stressed the talks are not over yet. Lawmakers could pick and choose parts of Trump’s wish list in an effort to craft a viable proposal. 

Doug Andres, a spokesman for Speaker Paul RyanPaul RyanThe Hill Interview: Budget Chair Black sticks around for now Gun proposal picks up GOP support GOP lawmaker Tim Murphy to retire at end of term MORE (R-Wis.), said House members “will review these principles” and continue to consult with the administration on a bill. 

Let’s make a deal

The million-dollar question surrounding the plan is whether Trump sees it as a final offer or the beginning of a negotiation. 

Trump signaled his willingness to make a deal to protect DACA recipients when he gave Congress a six-month window to broker a solution. 

Despite his hard-line rhetoric on immigration, Trump has long spoken favorably about young undocumented immigrants who benefit from the plan. He said in February he wanted to treat them “with heart.”

But since then, his team has driven a hard bargain, sparking talk that immigration restrictionists inside the administration are trying to regain control and ensure DACA is permanently quashed. 

The proof could come if or when Trump draws any red lines. Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, said he cannot envision a scenario in which Trump backs away from the wall money.

“The president has boxed himself in on the wall issue,” he said. 

Groups that favor strict immigration controls also say a new requirement that employers use E-Verify, which is used to verify employees’ immigration status, is nonnegotiable for them. 

Both measures, however, would be deal-breakers for Democrats, whose votes Trump will need to pass a DACA fix through Congress. 

The citizenship question 

Another major fault line is whether DACA recipients would be allowed to become U.S. citizens. 

Democrats, and some Republicans, have long called for a path to citizenship for “Dreamers,” a group of roughly 1.5 million young undocumented immigrants. Around 800,000 people benefit from DACA. 

But a White House official indicated citizenship could be off the table, telling The Washington Post that the administration is “not interested in granting a path to citizenship” in a DACA deal. 

Under that model, DACA recipients could live in the U.S. and receive work permits, but without any assurance they could remain long term. 

That would satisfy many immigration hard-liners who worry making them citizens could spark a wave of so-called “chain migration” — with DACA recipients’ relatives coming to the U.S. to join them. 

But immigrant-rights advocates say it’s a nonstarter, arguing citizenship for all “Dreamers” is well within the GOP mainstream. Ali Noorani, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, pointed to a bill drafted by Sens. James LankfordJames Paul LankfordRepublicans jockey for position on immigration Tillis-Lankford amnesty proposal is a betrayal of the American people This week: Congress gets ball rolling on tax reform MORE (Okla.) and Thom TillisThomas (Thom) Roland TillisRepublicans jockey for position on immigration Overnight Cybersecurity: Trump proclaims ‘Cybersecurity Awareness Month’ | Equifax missed chance to patch security flaw | Lawmakers await ex-CEO’s testimony | SEC hack exposed personal data Tillis-Lankford amnesty proposal is a betrayal of the American people MORE (N.C.) that essentially offers them a 15-year path to citizenship. 

The Stephen Miller factor

The administration said many government agencies weighed in with policy recommendations, including the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Customs and Border Control.

But White House senior policy adviser Stephen Miller is said to have spearheaded the effort to draft the principles and push them on Capitol Hill. He was joined by Attorney General Jeff SessionsJefferson (Jeff) Beauregard SessionsIntel leaders: Collusion still open part of investigation Republicans jockey for position on immigration Biden to Alabama: No more extremist senators MORE, his former boss during their days in the Senate. 

Both have long pushed for aggressive measures to curb the flow of illegal immigration and tough new measures to apprehend those living illegally in the U.S. 

Miller has solidified his influence inside the West Wing and the principles are one of the clearest examples yet of his ability to shape the administration’s stance on an issue about which he cares deeply.

By advancing these principles, Miller could also make it more difficult for Trump to get a deal on DACA — and thus more likely for the program to disappear.

Campaign promises

Trump has taken heat for months over his inability to secure a legislative victory or whittle down a lengthy list of unfulfilled campaign promises, including the wall. 

But Trump has checked a lot of boxes on immigration. 

In addition to his decision to scrap DACA, he has issued new directives that dramatically increase the number of immigrants considered priorities for deportation. 

The administration has threatened to withhold federal aid to “sanctuary cities” that refuse to help federal authorities enforce immigration law.

It has claimed the measures have resulted in a major spike in border apprehensions, and that a surge of new immigration judges are helping to close cases faster. 

The latest proposal is an indication that the Trump administration wants to step up its hard-line approach, and not go in the other direction.

 

Google Finds Accounts Connected to Russia Bought Election Ads

The ads appeared mainly alongside Google’s search results or on websites that use Google ads outside the search company’s own sites. It was not clear whether the ads appeared on YouTube or the Gmail email service, the person said.

There is a chance that Google may find other ads from Russian-linked accounts, the person familiar with the investigation said.

Google has been called to testify at a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on Nov. 1. But it has so far escaped the intense scrutiny confronting Facebook after the social network admitted that it discovered 470 profiles and pages to the Internet Research Agency, a Russian company with ties to the Kremlin.

The top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, Representative Adam B. Schiff of California, said it should not be surprising that Russians were using Google as well as Facebook and Twitter. The only thing that is surprising, he said, is that it took so long for Google to find the activity.

“It will take more time and length and breadth to know what Russia did on social media,” Mr. Schiff said. “But the themes are consistent across platforms: the desire to help Donald Trump, to hurt Hillary Clinton and the desire to set Americans against each other.”

Facebook has said the Russian company had placed 3,000 ads on its network at a cost of about $100,000. Last month, Twitter said it had found about 200 accounts that appeared to be linked to a Russian campaign to influence the election.

Newsletter Sign Up

Continue reading the main story

Google is the only company that sells more digital advertising than Facebook, and its role in the coordinated Russian campaign has been a source of intense speculation in Washington and Silicon Valley. The Washington Post reported earlier that Google has found that Russian agents hoping to spread misinformation had spent tens of thousands of dollars on the company’s advertising platforms.

But Google’s investigation hasn’t found the same type of targeted advertising that Russian agents conducted on Facebook. The social network allows advertisers to target its audience with more specificity than Google, including users with a wide range of political leanings.

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story

The 2016 presidential election marked the first time that Google allowed targeting by political leanings and it allowed two categories — left-leaning and right-leaning.

However, Google has not found any evidence that the ads from the accounts suspected of having ties to the Russian government used these political categories or geographic parameters to target specific groups, the person familiar with the company’s investigation said. The ads were much more broad, aimed at English-language queries or any users in the United States, for example.

A Google spokeswoman, Andrea Faville, said the company had a policy that limits political ad targeting and prohibits targeting based on race and religion.

“We are taking a deeper look to investigate attempts to abuse our systems, working with researchers and other companies, and will provide assistance to ongoing inquiries,” Ms. Faville said.

On Facebook, fake Russia-linked accounts — in which fictional people posed as American activists — promoted inflammatory messages on divisive issues. Those accounts bought advertising to promote those messages and reach a bigger audience within the Facebook universe, while promoting the incendiary posts to different locations or people with established political leanings for maximum impact.

While the Russian-linked accounts did not target ads based on political affiliation, it raises the question of why Google allowed such targeting for the 2016 election when it hadn’t done so in the past. The only location where Google allows ad targeting by political affiliation is the United States.

Google is working with Jigsaw, a think tank owned by its parent company, Alphabet. Jigsaw has been doing research for 18 months on fake news and misinformation campaigns and it is using some of those findings in the investigation into Russian election meddling, the person said. It is also working with other technology companies like Facebook and Twitter, in addition to independent researchers and law enforcement.

Follow Daisuke Wakabayashi on Twitter @daiwaka

Cecilia Kang contributed reporting from Washington.


Continue reading the main story

Feinstein, poised for another Senate run, says she’s ‘ready for a good fight’


Feinstein accused of ‘anti-Catholic bigotry’

Catholic nominee questioned about religion

Sen. Dianne Feinstein on Sunday gave her strongest indication so far that she’ll seek re-election, amid speculation the senior California Democratic senator will retire amid a potential 2018 challenge from her party’s progressive wing.

“I’m ready for a good fight. I’ve got things to fight for,” the 84-year-old Feinstein said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “I’m in a position where I can be effective. And, hopefully, that means something to California.”

Feinstein, who had a pacemaker implanted in January, joined the Senate in 1992 after winning a special election. She is now the oldest U.S. senator and would be 91 at the end of another six-year term, if re-elected in November 2018.

The senator has been pressed recently by reporters about whether she’ll run again.

“Well, we will see, won’t we?” she also said Sunday, when asked about another Senate campaign.

Progressives are purportedly frustrated enough about her views on President Trump, DACA and single-payer health care to mount a challenge for her seat.

She recently upset progressives when the Trump administration announced in September the dismantling of DACA, or Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, the Obama-era executive order that protects young illegal immigrants from deportation.

Feinstein said she supports DACA, but acknowledged the administration’s argument that the order is on shaky legal ground.

Her analysis came several days after being criticized at a town hall meeting in San Francisco for expressing optimism about Trump becoming “a good president.” The remark resulted in so much Democratic backlash that she issued a clarification about being “under no illusion” about Trump.

California Democrats until recently appeared on a nearly endless wait to rise in political circles — with Feinstein and fellow Democrat Barbara Boxer as the state’s long-standing U.S. senators and fellow party member Jerry Brown serving four straight terms as governor.

However, Boxer’s retirement allowed former state Attorney General Kamala Harris last year to win that Senate seat. And Brown leaves in January after his fourth, and final, term.

Feinstein also has continuously expressed reservations about the so-called single-payer health care plan championed by many progressives, including Vermont Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders, a 2016 Democratic presidential candidate and a potential 2020 challenger.

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Trump: ‘One of the greatest terms I’ve come up with is ‘fake”

In a new interview, President Trump praised his use of the word “fake,” saying he thinks it’s “one of the greatest” terms he’s used.

“I think one of the greatest of all terms I’ve come up with is ‘fake,’ ” Trump said in an interview with TBN host and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee (R). “I guess other people have used it, perhaps over the years, but I’ve never noticed it.”

Trump has often used the term in reference to the media and news coverage throughout his campaign and presidency.

Trump’s remarks came as he defended his administration from criticism following the response to the crisis in Puerto Rico. He said the media coverage of the trip was unfair. Pointing to a specific example, he defended tossing paper towels into a crowd at a church during the visit.

“They had these beautiful, soft towels, very good towels. And I came in and there was a crowd of a lot of people, and they were screaming and they were loving everything,” Trump said. “I was having fun, they were having fun.”

“They said, ‘throw ‘em to me! Throw ‘em to me Mr. President!’ ” Trump said, before pantomiming shooting a basketball in the same way he tossed the paper towels.

“So the next day they said, ‘oh it was so disrespectful to the people.’ It was just a made-up thing. And also when I walked in, the cheering was incredible,” he continued.

Trump also accused the media of “taking away the spirit of the country” in the interview.

Trump previously told Puerto Ricans “don’t believe the fake news” about his administration’s response to the storm.

Kim Jong Un praises nuclear program, promotes sister to center of power

SEOUL (Reuters) – North Korea’s leader Kim Jong Un said his nuclear weapons were a “powerful deterrent” that guaranteed its sovereignty, state media reported on Sunday, hours after U.S. President Donald Trump said “only one thing will work” in dealing with the isolated country.

Trump did not make clear to what he was referring, but his comments seemed to be a further suggestion that military action was on his mind.

In a speech to a meeting of the powerful Central Committee of the ruling Workers’ Party on Saturday, a day before Trump’s most recent comments, state media said Kim had addressed the “complicated international situation”.

North Korea’s nuclear weapons are a “powerful deterrent firmly safeguarding the peace and security in the Korean peninsula and Northeast Asia,” Kim said, referring to the “protracted nuclear threats of the U.S. imperialists.”

In recent weeks, North Korea has launched two missiles over Japan and conducted its sixth nuclear test, and may be fast advancing toward its goal of developing a nuclear-tipped missile capable of hitting the U.S. mainland.

North Korea is preparing to test-launch such a missile, a Russian lawmaker who had just returned from a visit to Pyongyang was quoted as saying on Friday.

Donald Trump has previously said the United States would “totally destroy” North Korea if necessary to protect itself and its allies.

The situation proved that North Korea’s policy of “byungjin”, meaning the parallel development of nuclear weapons and the economy was “absolutely right”, Kim Jong Un said in the speech.

“The national economy has grown on their strength this year, despite the escalating sanctions,” said Kim, referring to U.N. Security Council resolutions put in place to curb Pyongyang’s nuclear and missile program.

SISTER PROMOTION

The meeting also handled some personnel changes inside North Korea’s secretive and opaque ruling center of power, state media said.

Kim Jong Un’s sister, Kim Yo Jong, was made an alternate member of the politburo – the top decision-making body over which Kim Jong Un presides.

Alongside Kim Jong Un himself, the promotion makes Kim Yo Jong the only other millennial member of the influential body.

Her new position indicates the 28-year-old has become a replacement for Kim Jong Un’s aunt, Kim Kyong Hui, who had been a key decision maker when former leader Kim Jong Il was alive.

“It shows that her portfolio and writ is far more substantive than previously believed and it is a further consolidation of the Kim family’s power,” said Michael Madden, a North Korea expert at Johns Hopkins University’s 38 North website.

In January, the U.S. Treasury blacklisted Kim Yo Jong along with other North Korean officials over “severe human rights abuses”.

Kim Jong Sik and Ri Pyong Chol, two of the three men behind Kim’s banned rocket program, were also promoted.

State media announced that several other high ranking cadres were promoted to the Central Committee in what the South Korean unification ministry said could be an attempt by North Korea to navigate a way through its increasing isolation.

“The large-scale personnel reshuffle reflects that Kim Jong Un is taking the current situation seriously, and that he’s looking for a breakthrough by promoting a new generation of politicians,” the ministry said in a statement.

North Korea’s foreign minister Ri Yong Ho, who named Donald Trump “President Evil” in a bombastic speech to the U.N. General Assembly last month, was promoted to full vote-carrying member of the politburo.

“Ri can now be safely identified as one of North Korea’s top policy makers,” said Madden.

“Even if he has informal or off the record meetings, Ri’s interlocutors can be assured that whatever proposals they proffer will be taken directly to the top,” he said.

Additional reporting by Yuna Park in SEOUL; Editing by Christian Schmollinger and John Stonestreet

Harvey Weinstein Smiles While Leaving NYC Townhouse After Bombshell Sexual Harassment Claims

Harvey Weinstein appeared to be in good spirits while leaving his West Village townhouse in New York City on Friday, a day after apologizing for his “bad behavior” in the wake of the New York Times bombshell report about allegations of sexual harassment made against him.

The 65-year-old powerhouse film executive was photographed smiling in a black T-shirt and blue jeans as he walked from his home while carrying a stack of papers and what looked to be an iPad. His wife, Marchesa fashion designer Georgina Chapman, was also spotted leaving the townhouse separately.

On Thursday, The New York Times published a revealing exposé in which eight women, including actress Ashley Judd, spoke out against Weinstein, accusing him of sexual harassment and inappropriate behavior.

Weinstein responded to the allegations in the report, saying he was working with a therapist to address his issues head-on. “I appreciate the way I’ve behaved with colleagues in the past has caused a lot of pain, and I sincerely apologize for it,” he said. “Though I’m trying to do better, I know I have a long way to go.”

Georgina Chapman
William Farrington/Polaris

 

Though Weinstein’s attorney Lisa Bloom said in a statement that her client “denies many of the accusations as patently false” including Judd’s, he still said that he “bear[s] responsibility for my actions” in an interview to The New York Post on Friday.

Harvey Weinstein
William Farrington/Polaris

He told the post that his wife —who presented her brand’s bridal collection as the story dropped — is supporting him.

“She stands 100 percent behind me. Georgina and I have talked about this at length,” Weinstein said. “We went out with Lisa Bloom last night when we knew the article was coming out. Georgina will be with Lisa and others kicking my ass to be a better human being and to apologize to people for my bad behavior, to say I’m sorry, and to absolutely mean it.”

Weinstein also said he’s had several “tough conversations” with his family and that he’s working to prove he’s still “worthy” of them.

“I have had tough conversations with my family, really tough ones but my family is standing with me,” he later told the Daily Mail. “I have a journey and I have to prove to every person that’s out there that I’m worthy of them and I have to prove to my family the same thing,”

Harvey Weinstien
Bennett Raglin/WireImage

The Weinstein Company said Friday they had hired an independent law firm to investigate the allegations of sexual harassment against Weinstein at the company. In the meantime, the Shakespeare in Love producer will be taking an “indefinite leave of absence” from all business.

Weinstein appeared in support of the decision. “I also have the worst temper known to mankind, my system is all wrong, and sometimes I create too much tension. I lose it, and I am emotional, that’s why I’ve got to spend more time with a therapist and go away,” Weinstein told the Post about his leave of absence.

“My temper makes people feel intimidated, but I don’t even know when I’m doing it. In the past I used to compliment people, and some took it as me being sexual, I won’t do that again. I admit to a whole way of behavior that is not good. I can’t talk specifics, but I put myself in positions that were stupid, I want to respect women and do things better,” the Oscar-winning film producer added.

Harvey Weinstien and Ashley Judd
Jim Spellman/WireImage; CJ Rivera/Getty

Weinstein didn’t directly address the veracity of Judd’s claims but did discuss reading Judd’s memoir, All That Is Bitter and Sweet, in which she opened up about being a victim of sexual abuse and depression as a child.

“I never laid a glove on her,” Weinstein told the Post. “I know Ashley Judd is going through a tough time right now, I read her book. Her life story was brutal, and I have to respect her. In a year from now I am going to reach out to her.”

He also told the Daily Mail that he needs to “earn her forgiveness.”

RELATED VIDEO: Ashley Judd and Multiple Women Accuse Movie Mogul Harvey Weinstein of Sexual Harassment as He Announces Leave of Absence

Weinstein did not mention actress Rose McGowan, who was also named in the NYT piece as one of the women he had reached a settlement with.

McGowan reportedly reached a $100,000 settlement with Weinstein after an encounter in a hotel room with the executive producer in 1997 during the Sundance Film Festival.

The $100,000 payout was “not to be construed as an admission” by Weinstein, but intended to “avoid litigation and buy peace,” according to a legal document reportedly reviewed by the NYT.

Harvey Weinstein and Rose McGowan
Jeff Vespa/WireImage

While he is making some apologies, the Hollywood heavyweight still plans to sue the NYT for $50 million. Along with Bloom, Weinstein is also being represented by lawyer Charles Harder. In May 2016, Harder won a $140 million settlement for Hulk Hogan against Gawker.

Weinstein told the Post he is suing “because of the Times’ inability to be honest with me, and their reckless reporting. They told me lies. They made assumptions.”

Meanwhile on Friday, another woman stepped forward to accuse Weinstein of misconduct.

Lauren Sivan told the Huffington Post that Weinstein allegedly masturbated in front of her at Cafe Socialista, a Cuban-themed club and restaurant that Weinstein was an investor in about a decade ago, when she was a TV anchor at the time.

Sivan claims Weinstein took her to the restaurant’s kitchen, where the Hollywood producer and studio co-chairman proceeded to dismiss two staffers and attempted to kiss her, causing her to pull away and tell him she was in a relationship.

She told the outlet Weinstein answered with, “Well, can you just stand there and shut up.” She added Weinstein was blocking her exit through the kitchen, saying she was “trapped by [his] body and was intimidated.”

After the incident, Sivan claimed that Weinstein called her office the next day to tell her he “had a great time last night.” She said he invited her to meet with him again, but she reiterated her earlier statement of being in a relationship and ended the call.

Sivan claims she has had no further contact with Weinstein since the incident.

PEOPLE has reached out to Bloom and Harder regarding Sivan’s claims.