Dem wins Kentucky state House seat in district Trump won by 49 points

Kentucky Democrats on Tuesday reclaimed a rural district in the state House of Representatives that went heavily for President TrumpDonald John TrumpTillerson: Russia already looking to interfere in 2018 midterms Dems pick up deep-red legislative seat in Missouri Speier on Trump’s desire for military parade: ‘We have a Napoleon in the making’ MORE in 2016.

Linda Belcher (D), a former state legislator who lost her seat in the Trump landslide in Kentucky, reclaimed the Bullitt County district by a more than two-to-one margin, defeating her GOP opponent Rebecca Johnson 68 percent to 32 percent.

The Democrat had lost her seat in 2016 by just 150 votes, or less than 1 percentage point, even as Trump carried the district with 72 percent of the vote there compared to Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonTrump touts report Warner attempted to talk to dossier author Poll: Nearly half of Iowans wouldn’t vote for Trump in 2020 Rubio on Warner contact with Russian lobbyist: It’s ‘had zero impact on our work’ MORE‘s 23 percent. Sen. Rand PaulRandal (Rand) Howard PaulPentagon: War in Afghanistan will cost billion in 2018 Overnight Finance: Senators near two-year budget deal | Trump would ‘love to see a shutdown’ over immigration | Dow closes nearly 600 points higher after volatile day | Trade deficit at highest level since 2008 | Pawlenty leaving Wall Street group Rand Paul calls for punishment if Congress can’t reach a long-term budget deal MORE (R-Ky.) also won the district in 2016 with 64 percent of the vote.

Tuesday’s special election in the state’s House District 49 was held to replace former state Rep. Dan JohnsonDan JohnsonKentucky state lawmaker kills himself after denying sexual misconduct allegations: report MORE (R), who killed himself in December. Johnson, a pastor at a local church, had been accused of sexual abuse against a member of his congregation. He strongly denied the accusations, though he killed himself just days after local media reported the allegations.

Johnson’s widow, Rebecca Johnson, said she would run to replace her husband less than 24 hours after his death.

Belcher previously held the seat from 2008 to 2012 and from 2014 to 2016, when she lost to Dan Johnson.

Her victory Tuesday is the latest in a series of Democratic victories in special elections across the country over the past year.

The Kentucky district is the 18th formerly Republican-held district to fall into Democratic hands in a special election since Trump won election, a growing trend Democrats see as proof of their party’s momentum heading into the midterm elections. In 2018 alone, Democrats have won Republican-held state legislative districts in Missouri, Wisconsin and Florida.

“Flipping a seat that Trump won by such a considerable margin in 2016 shows the sea change happening across America in 2018,” said Jessica Post, the executive director of the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee. “Voters are speaking up about what they want to see in their elected leaders and volunteering their time and money to change the election maps.”

“When you have great candidates like Linda Belcher, results like tonight’s win are no surprise,” said Rocky Adkins, the Kentucky state House Democratic leader. “Tonight’s victory is also the first step of our journey to take back the Kentucky House of Representatives, and a week from tonight, during the next special election, we intend to take the second step.”

Kentucky Democrats have a lot more than two steps to go before they get within shouting distance of control of the state House. The chamber –– controlled by Democrats for a century before Republicans took over after the 2016 elections –– now has just 37 Democrats among its 100 members.

Updated: 8:29 p.m.

Former Skadden Lawyer Pleads Guilty to Lying in Russia Investigation

They have yet to be sentenced and have committed to cooperating with the special counsel. It was unclear on Tuesday to what extent Mr. van der Zwaan is cooperating, but his plea agreement does not compel him to do so.

Mr. van der Zwaan’s gilt-edged life was based in London, where he worked for Skadden and lived with his wife after they were married last summer in a lavish English countryside wedding featured in the Russian edition of Tatler magazine. A 2006 law school graduate of King’s College London, he speaks four languages: Russian, Dutch, English and French.

His father-in-law, German Khan, who was born in Ukraine, is an owner of Alfa Group, Russia’s largest financial and industrial investment group. He was on a recent Treasury Department roster of prominent Russian officials and oligarchs.

Tuesday’s court hearing left many questions unanswered about Mr. van der Zwaan, including why he failed to be forthcoming to federal investigators about his communications with Mr. Gates and a second person who was identified by prosecutors only as “a longtime business associate of Manafort and Gates in Ukraine.”

Mr. van der Zwaan’s lies involved a 2012 report prepared by Skadden and used to defend Mr. Yanukovych, then the Russia-aligned president of Ukraine, from international criticism over the prosecution and incarceration of one of his political rivals, former Prime Minister Yulia V. Tymoshenko. State Department officials criticized the report, which purported to be the result of the law firm’s independent research, as a misleading account of the actions of Mr. Yanukovych’s government.

Mr. Mueller’s team scrutinized the report as part of its examination of the business dealings of Mr. Manafort and Mr. Gates in Ukraine, where Mr. Manafort worked for about a decade as a political consultant before he joined the Trump campaign. Among other charges, both men have been accused of “using one of their offshore accounts to funnel $4 million to pay secretly” for the report. It is unclear how much, if any, of that money went to Skadden or other firms with which they worked.

Newsletter Sign Up

Continue reading the main story

The Ukrainian authorities had begun their own investigation into payments for the report after Mr. Yanukovych fled Ukraine for Russia amid a popular uprising in 2014.

Mr. van der Zwaan told the special counsel on Nov. 3 that he had not spoken to Mr. Gates since mid-August 2016, even though Mr. Gates had called him the following month instructing him to get in contact with an unidentified mutual acquaintance, court papers show.

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story

He also told prosecutors that he had not talked to that same acquaintance since 2014, even though he called that person in September 2016 to discuss possible criminal charges against Mr. Manafort, a law firm and a former Ukrainian justice minister. The phone conversation, conducted in Russian, was important enough that Mr. van der Zwaan recorded it, according to court papers. Mr. van der Zwaan followed up by calling Mr. Gates, recording that conversation as well.

One of those conversations involved payments that were described as “the tip of the iceberg,” Andrew Weissmann, a prosecutor in Mr. Mueller’s office, said in court. He did not elaborate.

Mr. van der Zwaan also acknowledged that he lied when he told investigators that he had only a “passive role in the rollout of the report,” according to court papers. In fact, prosecutors said, he had discussed with Mr. Gates and others how to publicize the report to make it appear less damning to Mr. Yanukovych’s government, including describing any mishandling of Ms. Tymoshenko’s prosecution as no more than “procedural” errors. Part of the strategy, Mr. Weissmann said in court, was to give an advance copy of the report to The New York Times.

The law firm’s work was being investigated by Ukraine’s top prosecutor, which asked the Department of Justice for help in questioning eight lawyers named as authors of the report, including Mr. van der Zwaan, according to documents reviewed by The Times.

Among the others were Gregory B. Craig, who served as President Barack Obama’s White House counsel, and Clifford M. Sloan, who also worked in the Obama administration. Both Mr. Craig and Mr. Sloan declined to comment.

The Ukrainian officials claimed that Mr. Yanukovych’s government circumvented contracting rules by initially agreeing to pay Skadden a fee that was less than the threshold for competitive bidding — reportedly about $12,000 — then later paying the firm a total of nearly $1.1 million.

Last year, the law firm refunded $567,000 to the Ukrainian government. The firm said the refund represented “the balance of Ukraine’s payment, which had been held in escrow for future work.”

A sentencing hearing for Mr. van der Zwaan was set for April 3.

The charges against him were the seventh criminal case that Mr. Mueller’s team has brought since October. Last week, the special counsel’s office indicted 13 Russians and three companies on charges of interfering in the 2016 United States election with a sophisticated influence campaign on popular social media platforms. An American, Richard Pinedo, of Santa Paula, Calif., also pleaded guilty to identity fraud regarding some bank accounts used by the Russians in their influence campaign.


Continue reading the main story

Florida shooting: West Point admits murdered hero Peter Wang

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Peter Wang was one of 17 killed in February’s mass school shooting

A junior cadet who died helping other students escape a Florida school shooting has been posthumously accepted into a prestigious US military school.

Peter Wang, 15, one of 17 killed in the 14 February attack, was admitted to the class of 2025 at his dream school, West Point Academy.

He was a member of the US Army Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (JROTC), a school programme for potential US military officers.

His funeral took place on Tuesday.

  • Clooneys make pledge to gun reform march
  • Florida shooting: Who are the victims?

The school will confer a letter of admission and honorarium tokens to his family, local West Point alumni Chad Maxey told the Sun Sentinel newspaper.

Florida Governor Rick Scott also reportedly directed the state’s National Guard to honour Peter and two other members of the JROTC at their funerals.

Image copyright
BBC (supplied)

Image caption

Peter Wang was reportedly wearing his JROTC uniform when he died

The US Army bestowed the Medal of Heroism on three students who were killed, including Peter, according to US media.

The Cadet Command also approved Junior ROTC Heroism Medals for 14-year-old cadets Alaina Petty and Martin Duque, an army spokesman told US media.

Peter was in uniform when he was fatally shot while holding the door for others fleeing a gunman at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, witnesses say.

Media captionStudents staged an anti-gun ‘lie-in’

The recognition comes after an online petition called for him to be laid to rest with military honours, saying he “deserves” to be buried as a hero, because “his selfless and heroic actions have led to the survival of dozens in the area”.

Peter, who had spent part of his childhood in his parents’ native China, had dreamed of attending the West Point military academy, friends say.

Jesse Pan, a neighbour and longstanding friend of Peter’s family, told the BBC Chinese Service he had tried to support the teenager’s parents as they struggled to cope with the loss.

“I was there with his parents, helping translating and finding a funeral home,” he said.

“His parents fainted as soon as they saw his body. He had got multiple shots in front… So horrible.”

Skip Twitter post by @sunrisepost365

End of Twitter post by @sunrisepost365

Meanwhile, about 100 students from Stoneman Douglas have travelled by bus to the Florida state capitol, where they plan to hold a rally against gun violence on Wednesday.

Some of them arrived on Tuesday in time to see the Republican-controlled state legislature reject a proposed ban on assault weapons and large capacity magazines.

State lawmakers voted down the measure after opening their session with a prayer for the victims of the Parkland high school shooting.

The students, whose school is shut until 27 February, are hoping their march inspires others across the US.

A larger protest is being planned for Washington DC on 24 March.

Skip Twitter post by @PaulNBlake

End of Twitter post by @PaulNBlake

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday called for a ban on rapid-fire “bump stock” devices, which were used last October’s Las Vegas massacre, but not in the Florida high school attack.

The Parkland school was the scene of a deadly rampage last week, when an ex-student allegedly opened fire with an AR-15 assault rifle.

The suspect, Nikolas Cruz, had moved in with a friend, who also attended the school, after his adoptive mother died in 2017.

The parents who hosted Mr Cruz, James and Kimberly Snead, told CBS News the teenager was depressed but they did not realise how troubled he was.

Media captionEmma Gonzalez told a rally that the massacre was not only a mental health issue

“The Nik we knew was not the Nik that everybody else seemed to know,” James Snead told CBS.

“He pulled one over on us. As well as a lot of people,” Mrs Snead said.

Mr Snead, a US army veteran, said he knew Mr Cruz had guns but believed he had the only key to the safe where they were located.

He added that it was Mr Cruz’s right to have guns.

Image copyright
ABC

Image caption

James and Kimberly Snead told ABC about how they took in the troubled teenager after his adopted mum died

Law enforcement officials say that Mr Cruz legally purchased seven rifles in the last year, despite several mental health warnings.

The couple also told ABC News that Mr Cruz had texted their son only three minutes before the attack began in Parkland, Florida, to say he was “going to the movies”.

When they first saw him at the police station after he was arrested, he “mumbled” an apology to the parents.

Documents obtained by CBS show that Mr Cruz and his late adoptive mother, Lynda Cruz, were visited by Florida’s Department of Children and Families (DCF) after allegations of medical neglect in September 2016.

The investigator reportedly determined that Mr Cruz suffered from depression, ADHD and autism, had cut his arms in a post on social media and once plastered a racist message on his school backpack.

Officials closed the investigation after deciding he was not being mistreated, according to CBS News.

Trump Moves to Regulate ‘Bump Stock’ Devices

In Florida on Tuesday, the State House rejected efforts to immediately consider a bill to ban assault rifles even as students from Stoneman Douglas High School watched from the gallery. But the vote was on an unusual procedural motion, and legislative leaders said they would consider other gun control measures before the session ends in March.

At the White House, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the president’s spokeswoman, said the president was determined to find ways to protect Americans, and especially children, from gunmen. Asked about a broader ban on assault weapons, Ms. Sanders said the White House has not “closed the door on any front.”

Interactive Graphic

What Is a Bump Stock and How Does It Work?

“Bump stocks” are attachments that enable semiautomatic rifles to fire faster, almost like machine guns. Twelve of the rifles found in the hotel room of the Las Vegas gunman were fitted with the devices.


Despite the day’s developments, there was deep skepticism in Washington that anything would change because of the long history of inaction by state and federal politicians after similar mass shootings. Gun control activists said they were braced for another disappointing battle with lawmakers.

The president, they noted, promised unwavering fealty last year to the National Rifle Association, drawing thunderous applause at its annual convention by declaring, “To the N.R.A., I can proudly say I will never, ever let you down.” The group in turn enthusiastically endorsed Mr. Trump and spent $30 million on his campaign.

Senator Christopher S. Murphy, Democrat of Connecticut, who sponsored the latest background check measure with Senator John Cornyn, Republican of Texas, said he was unimpressed by Mr. Trump’s openness to it. “Let’s not pretend this is some huge concession on his part,” he said. “If this is all the White House is willing to do to address gun violence, it’s wholly insufficient.”

The background check bill, which seeks to improve the existing database used to prevent gun purchases by criminals and the mentally ill, is a small nod in the direction of gun control that does nothing to close loopholes that allow millions of gun sales without a background check. Last year, N.R.A. officials said they were fine with it.

It is also unclear whether Mr. Trump’s statement of support for the measure, which included a desire for some “revisions,” might be linked to other legislation that the N.R.A. backs. In the House, a similar background check measure was combined with legislation that would effectively allow people to legally carry concealed weapons in all 50 states.

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story

That legislation is the top priority for the N.R.A., and gun control activists have promised to fight it aggressively.

“That normalizes the carrying of guns on all American streets,” said John Feinblatt, the president of Everytown for Gun Safety, a group that advocates gun control measures. He said joining the two measures would be a “craven” bait-and-switch and “disrespectful for all the families” of the Florida school that suffered through last week’s shooting.

The president’s bump stock announcement surprised the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, which did not appear to have been informed of the pending remarks from Mr. Trump. The Justice Department announced a review of the devices in early December. Led by the A.T.F., the review sought to determine whether the bureau — which is responsible for policing firearms — was able to regulate the devices without action from Congress.

Under the Obama administration, the bureau had determined it could not regulate them. Given that prior position, A.T.F. officials had indicated privately in the months after the Las Vegas massacre that any ban of bump stocks would require new legislation.

Bump stocks were not used on the rifle in the shooting last week in Florida, the authorities said.

Mr. Trump’s announcement on Tuesday appeared to short-circuit the agency’s review. The A.T.F. had not yet determined whether it had the authority to ban the devices when Mr. Trump directed Mr. Sessions to draft a regulation doing so.

In a statement, an A.T.F. official said she was “not authorized to comment on pending legislation, legislative proposals or the possibility of executive action.” A Justice Department spokesman said that the department “understands this is a priority for the president.”

The shooting in Florida prompted the White House to highlight the administration’s actions as students from the school included Mr. Trump among the politicians they criticized for failing to keep them safe.

In an impassioned speech on Saturday, Emma Gonzalez, a senior at the school, assailed the president’s N.R.A. ties and accused him of setting a crass monetary value on the lives of gunshot victims by taking so much money from the gun-rights group.

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story

“If you don’t do anything to prevent this from continuing to occur, that number of gunshot victims will go up and the number that they are worth will go down,” Ms. Gonzalez said on Saturday at a rally for gun control. “And we will be worthless to you.”

With funerals underway for those who died at the Florida high school, Mr. Trump said that he plans to host a “listening session” on Wednesday with high school students and teachers at the White House. He is scheduled to meet on Thursday with state and local officials to discuss school safety.

Ms. Sanders told reporters on Tuesday that the session on Wednesday will include students and parents from the Florida school as well as people affected by school shootings at Columbine High School in Colorado and Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. She did not say whether any of the student activists who have been critical of Mr. Trump were invited to the White House.

Patricia Mazzei contributed reporting from New York, and Ali Watkins from Washington.


Continue reading the main story

Dissecting ‘Black Panther’ and Its Most Impactful Moments

[Warning: This story contains spoilers for Black Panther]

Black Panther is the new king of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. The film is the studio’s best-reviewed movie, it’s breaking box-office records and it’s also the rare tentpole that’s truly speaking to broader cultural moment.

The team at Heat Vision is breaking down the twists, turns and impactful moments — and is also welcoming indie filmmaker (and Marvel fanatic) Theo Brown as a guest to help process everything.

Aaron Couch: Any time a Marvel movie comes out, the immediate question becomes “where does this rank in the MCU pantheon?” But the conversation for this movie is …. “wait, is this the best Marvel movie ever?” It’s a fair question. I’ve got to go by the feeling I had leaving the theater, as well as the way that feeling lingered for days. As much as really I like most of the Marvel movies, the first Avengers, the first Guardians of the Galaxy and Black Panther are the ones that have had similar effects, where I left feeling I’d seen something truly new.

Graeme McMillan: This is, for me, the best of the Marvel movies. It feels the most complete, and the most fully realized.

Couch: Graeme, I must stop you here. This is now three Marvel movies in a row that you really liked. Am I going to have to stop teasing you about being “grumpy”?

McMillan: I’m as shocked as you are, Aaron. But this movie is just… really good. There’s no over-reliance on other Marvel movies — even T’Chaka’s death in Civil War is given just the right amount of flashbacks to make it feel part of this story — and enough of an emotional journey for T’Challa, but also Killmonger, to feel like a complete story in and of itself. Plus, you know, every single person in this movie is charming and the kind of character you want to see appear in multiple movies, from Okoye to W’Kabi to Shuri, who completely stole every single scene she was in. Forget about the Avengers and the Guardians of the Galaxy: Just make every single Marvel movie about these guys from now on, please. 

Richard Newby: That’s one of the things that really struck me about the movie; every character is given a viable backstory and enough set-up for the future to lead their own film. Feige has talked a lot about the potential for spin-offs going forward, particularly with James Gunn’s cosmic side of the MCU, but I think almost every character in Black Panther is just as worthy of that potential. And despite taking place in almost entirely single location, Wakanda feels just as rich in terms of history and location as the planets we’ve visited in the Guardians of the Galaxy films. A sequel is guaranteed, but if the MCU really wanted to continue to break new ground going forward, I think Marvel Team-Up style movies with the Black Panther characters could be a good place to start. I’d pay top dollar to see Shuri team-up with Valkyrie, or a Nakia and Black Widow spy movie. And then there’s Killmonger, who could have an entire movie to himself with his backstory. More Michael B. Jordan in the MCU would never be a bad thing.

Patrick Shanley: I truly love Chadwick Boseman and have been a diehard fan of his since 42, so to see him leading a Marvel tentpole has been very exciting for me as a fanboy of his. That said, Jordan really steals the show here with much more limited screen time. I think it’s not much of a stretch to say that his Killmonger is now the standard for Marvel villains.

Rebecca Sun: Seeing how capably intersectional Black Panther manages to be really underscores how little excuse there is for pretty much every other action tentpole to be giving half of the population such short shrift. There’s no “token female” in Black Panther because the film is so naturally populated with multiple women who occupy distinct, multifaceted roles. Nakia is not just the love interest; she’s also a spy and humanitarian. Shuri is not just a tech whiz; she’s also a princess who loves goofing on her brother. Okoye is not just the head of the kingdom’s special forces; she’s also a woman torn between sworn duty and what her heart believes to be right (she also is no asexualized warrior; Black Panther makes clear that this is a strong black woman who also is someone’s beloved).

Theo Brown: As soon as I saw it, I wanted more. More fleshed out stories about the Jabari tribe, or W’Kabi and his life as the guardians of Wakanda’s borders, or of course, the Dora Milaje (who have given me a reason to add Rise of the Black Panther to my comic pull list). And doesn’t Shuri feel like the MCU version of Riri Williams, who created her own Iron Man suit? Just saying, it works pretty well…

Ryan Parker: Michael B. Jordan is exceptional in this movie, and I loved his character. For the first time in a Marvel film, I really believed the villain and his motivation. I even sympathized with him. It made the story just that much more powerful. For a while, I couldn’t decide who I wanted to be victorious. 

CouchAs much fun as Loki is … Jordan just makes him seem almost silly and superfluous. When Jordan was cast, I half-assumed that Coogler was bringing him on board for a small role out of tradition since they are such close collaborators. The trailers did not spoil the fact that Jordan has a huge role and is as much the star as Boseman is. He is the best MCU villain, and injects more politics into the movie than even anything in the excellent Captain America: Winter Soldier. The same goes for legends like Forest Whitaker and Angela Bassett. Usually when actors of their caliber (ala Anthony Hopkins in the Thor movies) are cast in films like this, they rarely get enough to do. But that’s not the case here.

Brown: I think that Jordan’s cause comes across much more urgently because he’s dealing with real stakes that are much larger than the MCU — in his mind, he’s positioned himself as an hero for impoverished Africans and African Americans across the globe. It has a bit of a heavier weight to it than Loki just wanting people to kneel and bow to him. These are real world problems that could have real world consequences.

Newby: I think Killmonger works as well as he does because the politics are stemming from a very emotional place. I love Winter Soldier, but it’s concern over potential threats feels slightly removed from the characters, and is ultimately dictated by good and evil when it comes down to the wire. But with Killmonger everything political is personal. Jordan puts him in this moral gray area by portraying him like an open wound surrounded by scar tissue.

McMillan: As Ryan said, I love how sympathetic Killmonger actually is, on multiple levels. He’s wrong, sure— but he’s not entirely wrong, and that tension is compelling. As is the tension in T’Challa’s initial desire to keep Wakanda separate from the rest of the world, especially as a movie released right now, with the current administration threatening to become more isolationist in terms of international aid. Nakia being the voice of conscience throughout the whole thing is wonderful, and another political message, subtly: it’s the woman of color who’s right all along. When was the last time we got to see that in a massive mainstream movie?

Sun: Black Panther‘s inclusiveness reminds me of Wonder Woman‘s. Both films could have stayed within the bounds of their built-in marketing taglines – “the black (male) superhero movie,” “the (white) lady superhero movie” – and yet took the time to do what all their counterparts dedicated to white male heroism seldom do. (In Wonder Woman‘s case, offer brief yet poignant glimpses into the personal obstacles faced by Diana and Steve’s Native American and Arab allies.)

Newby: I love that T’Challa is surrounded by black women in the movie, because as much as Black Panther is a story of fathers and sons, it’s also a story of how women shape the throne and its policies. And to go back to Killmonger for a second, it’s very interesting to see how he interacts with his female accomplice, and her fate, juxtaposed with T’Challa’s relationships with the women in his life. I’d argue that Killmonger’s greatest tragedy isn’t that he grew up without a father, but that he grew up without a mother, sister, or lover who speaks her mind — or even speaks at all. T’Challa succeeds both as king and as superhero because of the women in his life and that speaks volumes. 

Brown: Richard, I’ve been thinking about that a lot, especially after more viewings. I love that the women in the film seem to match some parallels of what women in black communities unfortunately far too often deal with — like showcasing how the mother alone is the matriarch of the family, managing her own emotions while keeping the family intact and pushing forward for greatness regardless of the circumstances. Or how being educated in the STEM fields and accomplishing high raking positions are prevalent in the women on screen (African American women are one of the most educated groups in America, statistics say). I felt like there was a lot of nods of affirmation with these things.

Parker: One of the aspects that sets it apart from other Marvel films is its pacing. I love how well it is paced. I am a huge Marvel nerd, but in most of the films, the fight scenes just go on way too long — to the point where I am almost bored. Not Black Panther. Scenes were just long enough for some great action and plot movement and then, BAM, on to the next. Oh, and that car chase scene was some of the most fun I have had watching a movie in some time. 

Newby: The pacing reminded me a lot of the pacing in Coogler’s previous movie, Creed. No scene is extraneous or fails to add another important layer to a character. Plus, the characters’ backstories are woven in organically. Coogler manages to position all the players in a way that makes Black Panther feel like a true ensemble piece where everyone gets in on the action and the emotional beats without bringing the film to a halt. Even Martin Freeman’s Everett K. Ross, who could have been one character too many, gets to make his mark by the film’s climax.

Shanley: And that’s quite a hard thing to accomplish, yet Marvel has now done it twice (previously in Civil War and here in Black Panther). Coogler really handles screen time and character depth masterfully in this movie. The film never feels bloated, despite the fact that even minor side characters have fully fleshed out, and truly interesting, backstories. I wasn’t lacking for it, but that give me even more hope for what will be a completely jam-packed Infinity War.

McMillan: Really, the only problem I had with the movie was the climactic fight, and that’s because it felt too much like “Two CGI guys fight each other surrounded by CGI.” The earlier chase sequence avoided that, and felt wonderfully physical and real, and you’re right — the pacing for almost all of the movie was far better than the other Marvel movies. I wonder how something like Avengers: Infinity War is going to feel after a movie like this?

Brown: I know that after watching the Avengers: Infinity War trailer for the umpteenth time, the fact that it seems to have a major battle in Wakanda is all the more interesting now, given the tech, culture, and diverse armies they have. I’m personally much more invested in this city than I was in Asgard (R.I.P.), so I can’t wait to see what Marvel gives us in a few months. What a time to be alive.

Parker: Did anyone else catch the Back to the Future: Part II reference in there with the shoes? That was just brilliant. Also, I love how meta it is at the end with the Disneyland reference. Normally, something like that would make me roll my eyes, but I loved it in this instance. 

Sun: Ryan, clearly you are out of touch with today’s youths, because Shuri’s mocking of her brother’s sandals is a reference to the “What are Thooose?” Vine meme of 2015.

Couch: Guys, I think you are both right. The reference speaks both to today’s youths and to the oldsters.

Sun: Either way, to me it was a stunningly hip reference that emphasized not only how organically Black Panther has tapped into the zeitgeist but also how it may be the realest MCU movie yet. I’m still marveling (pun intended) at the audacity of Ryan Coogler to use a superhero vehicle to make a movie about geopolitics and the African-American experience. Killmonger’s last line will haunt me for a very long time.

Black Panther

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Issues New Congressional Map To Replace Gerrymandered One

In an opinion earlier in February, the state Supreme Court wrote that Pennsylvania’s congressional districts need, at minimum, to be compact and contiguous, to contain roughly the same number of people, and to not split counties and other communities unnecessarily. A map was unconstitutional, the court said, when it prioritized partisan advantage over those criteria.

Tillerson dismisses criticism on Russia sanctions amid growing questions

The indictment Friday of 13 Russians accused of waging “information warfare” in the 2016 U.S. presidential election is raising new questions about why the Trump administration still has not imposed sanctions designed to punish Russia and deter it from interfering in the 2018 midterms.

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson was asked on the CBS program “60 Minutes” why the administration has not done what Congress directed when it overwhelmingly passed legislation last summer calling for new sanctions.

“We have and we are,” he responded. “We’ve taken steps that have already prevented a number of Russian military sales as a result of the legislation, and we are evaluating additional individuals for possible sanctioning.”

But while the administration argues that the threat of sanctions has met the intended effect of the law, there have been no new sanctions on Russia since its passage, leading Democrats to express outrage.

Trump begrudgingly signed the law in August, but warned it was unconstitutional in parts. Since then, there have been questions about whether he would fully enforce the law designed to tie his hands and force him to clamp down on Russia, especially because he’s also repeatedly declined to even criticize Russia’s actions.

Jorge Silva/Pool Photo via AP
President Donald Trump and Russia’s President Vladimir Putin talk as Vietnam’s President Tran Dai Quan, right, looks on during the family photo session at the APEC Summit in Danang, Vietnam, Nov. 11, 2017.

In October, the administration missed a deadline by weeks to publish a list of Russian entities and individuals in the defense and intelligence sectors. Those groups are already under sanctions, but anyone doing business with them would face American sanctions starting January 29.

But when that day came, the State and Treasury departments did not impose any sanctions, instead saying the threat of sanctions had achieved the goal of disrupting and ending billions of dollars worth of such deals.

“Since the enactment of the CAATSA legislation, we estimate that foreign governments have abandoned planned or announced purchases of several billion dollars in Russian defense acquisitions,” State Department spokesperson Heather Nauert said in a statement at the time, using an acronym for the law – Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act.

The administration has not published any evidence or details of the allegedly disrupted deals, citing private diplomatic conversations. Trump administration officials did, however, brief members of Congress about their efforts, which at least satisfied even Democrats initially.

Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md., then the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, “welcomed” the briefing and said he “appreciate[d] the administration’s engagement with Congress on this issue.” Cardin was one of the authors of the sanctions law, officially called the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act, or CAATSA.

Since then, the pressure for more sanctions has escalated. Last Thursday, the White House released a statement blaming Russia for a massive cyber attack last year known as the “NotPetya” that overwhelmed Ukraine and hit some businesses, banks, and media organizations in other countries. The following day, special counsel Robert Mueller announced indictments against 13 Russian citizens, laying out in great detail Russia’s intricate plot to interfere and disrupt the U.S. presidential election.

Zach Gibson/Bloomberg via Getty Images
The silhouette of Robert Mueller, former director of the FBI and special counsel for the U.S. Department of Justice, is seen as he leaves the U.S. Capitol Building, June 20, 2017.

Together, the two underscored the seriousness of the cyber threat from Russia, renewing calls for sanctions — and criticism of Trump for not taking seriously enough the danger, especially after his top administration officials like Tillerson and CIA director Mike Pompeo have warned Russia is looking to interfere again in the 2018 congressional elections.

“Since coming into office, President Trump has failed to address the ongoing threat to our security posed by Russia’s international assault on the democratic process,” Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., now the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said in a statement Friday.

“He continues to ignore congressional will with respect to the mandatory sanctions passed last year. It has been more than six months since [the sanctions bill] was signed into law, and not one, mandatory sanction has been imposed,” he added. “It’s inexcusable.”

But the administration has deflected, saying new sanctions could be coming. Tillerson’s comments echoed those of Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin, who was grilled during congressional testimony last week.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov (L) and U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson shake hands in the Treaty Room before heading into meetings at the State Department, May 10, 2017, in Washington.

“We are actively working on Russia’s sanctions,” he told the Senate Finance Committee Wednesday.

After Sen. Claire McCaskill, a Missouri Democrat, interrogated him about whether Trump has asked him to impose sanctions, Mnuchin said the president was supportive.

“I told him we would be doing sanctions against Russia, and he was pleased to hear that,” he said.

Among those potential new sanctions, the law ordered the administration to impose sanctions for Russians and those who aid Russia in cyberattacks — unless the White House can certify that “the Government of the Russian Federation has made significant efforts to reduce the number and intensity of cyber intrusions.”

Four top Democrats urged the imposition of these sanctions in a letter to Trump and Tillerson last month, but the administration has not yet taken any steps to implement those.