Iranian oil tanker burns, 32 missing after collision off China’s coast

BEIJING (Reuters) – A tanker carrying Iranian oil and run by the country’s top oil shipping firm was ablaze and spewing cargo into the East China Sea on Sunday after colliding with a Chinese freight ship, leaving the tanker’s 32 crew members missing, the Chinese government said.

Thick clouds of dark smoke could be seen billowing out of the Sanchi tanker, engulfing the vessel as rescue efforts were hampered by bad weather and fire on and around the ship, Mohammad Rastad, head of Iran’s Ports and Maritime Organisation, told Iranian television. (Graphic: Map showing ship collision location – tmsnrt.rs/2CBgqai)

The Sanchi, run by the country’s top oil shipping operator, collided with the CF Crystal about 160 nautical miles off the coast near Shanghai and the mouth of the Yangtze River Delta on Saturday evening, the Chinese Ministry of Transportation said in a statement.

The Panama-registered tanker was sailing from Iran to South Korea, carrying 136,000 tonnes of condensate, an ultra light crude. That is equivalent to just under 1 million barrels, worth about $60 million, based on global crude oil prices.

“Sanchi is floating and burning as of now,” the Chinese ministry said. “There is an oil slick and we are pushing forward with rescue efforts.”

It had sent four rescue ships and three cleaning boats to the site by 9 a.m. (0100 GMT) on Sunday, the ministry added.

Chinese state media CCTV showed pictures of the tanker ablaze and billowing plumes of thick dark smoke.

South Korea also dispatched a ship and helicopter to help. A Korean Coast Guard official confirmed the fire was still raging at 1 p.m. (0500 GMT).

The tanker’s 32 crew members are all Iranian nationals except for two Bangladeshi nationals, the Chinese transport ministry said.

“There is a wide perimeter of flames around the vessel because of the spillage and search and rescue efforts are being carried out with difficulty,” Iran’s Rastad said.

“Unfortunately, up to this moment, there is no news of the crew,” he said.

CF Crystal’s 21 crew members, all Chinese nationals, were rescued and the ship suffered “non-critical” damage, China’s transport ministry said.

Shipping experts said the incident could potentially disrupt shipping in and around Shanghai, one of the world’s largest and busiest ports.

It was not immediately clear how much environmental damage had been caused or the volume of oil spilled into the sea.

The last major oil tanker disaster was the sinking of the Prestige off Spain in November 2002, which was carrying 77,000 tonnes of heavy fuel oil and caused one of Europe’s worst environmental catastrophes.

About 63,000 tonnes of its cargo leaked into the Atlantic, damaging beaches in France, Spain and Portugal and forcing the closure of Spain’s richest fishing grounds.

That was almost twice the size of the Exxon Valdez spill, which ravaged Alaska’s coast in 1989.

MAJOR MARITIME INCIDENT

The incident also marked the first major maritime incident involving an Iranian tanker since the lifting of international sanctions against Iran in January 2016.

There was a collision involving an NITC-operated supertanker in the Singapore Strait in August 2016, but there was no loss of life or pollution.

The Chinese government gave no details of the size of the spill. The Foreign Ministry said in a separate statement that the cause of the incident was under investigation.

Reuters ship tracking data shows Sanchi was built in 2008 and was managed by the National Iranian Tanker Co (NITC). Its registered owner is Bright Shipping Ltd.

It was due to arrive at Daesan in South Korea from Kharg Island in Iran on Sunday, according to Reuters ship tracking.

The Sanchi tanker, leased by Hanwha Total Petrochemical Co Ltd, had “valid foreign insurance”, Iranian oil ministry spokesman Kasra Nouri told Iran’s state television.

Hanwha Total was not immediately available for comment.

Norwegian ship insurer Skuld confirmed it was the lead hull insurer for the tanker and the protection and indemnity (PI) insurer for CF Crystal.

“We are working very closely with the relevant authorities to establish the facts surrounding the collision,” it said in a statement.

Sanchi collided with CF Crystal, registered in Hong Kong, which was carrying 64,000 tonnes of grain from the United States to China’s southern province of Guangdong, the Chinese government said.

CF Crystal, which was built in 2011, was due to arrive in China on Jan. 10, according to Reuters ship tracking data.

Reporting by Meng Meng and Josephine Mason in BEIJING and Jonathan Saul in LONDON; Additional reporting from Yuna Park and Jane Chung in SEOUL and Dubai Newsroom; Editing by Himani Sarkar/ Clarence Fernandez/Elaine Hardcastle

Bannon expresses regret after slamming Trump family in new book


Steve Bannon is pictured. | AP Photo

“My support is also unwavering for the president and his agenda,” former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon said.

The White House continues its attacks on Michael Wolff’s book.

01/07/2018 11:37 AM EST

Updated 01/07/2018 02:13 PM EST


Steve Bannon expressed regret Sunday after he created a furor with comments critical of President Donald Trump’s family in a new book, dragging the controversy into its fifth day as the White House kept up its attacks on both the former chief strategist and “Fire and Fury” author Michael Wolff.

“Donald Trump, Jr. is both a patriot and a good man. He has been relentless in his advocacy for his father and the agenda that has helped turn our country around,” Bannon said in a statement. “I regret that my delay in responding to the inaccurate reporting regarding Don Jr has diverted attention from the president’s historical accomplishments in the first year of his presidency.”

Story Continued Below

Wolff quoted Bannon in “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House” as saying that the decision by several members of the president’s family and campaign staff to attend a meeting with a Russian lawyer who had offered to provide dirt on Hillary Clinton was “treasonous” and “unpatriotic.”

Trump Jr., Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner and onetime campaign chief Paul Manafort attended the June 2016 gathering. Bannon was also quoted as saying special counsel Robert Mueller would “crack Don Jr. like an egg on national TV.”

In his statement Sunday, first obtained by Axios, Bannon said the comments about the Trump Tower meeting were actually meant to criticize Manafort, not Trump Jr.

“My comments were aimed at Paul Manafort, a seasoned campaign professional with experience and knowledge of how the Russians operate. He should have known they are duplicitous, cunning and not our friends. To reiterate, those comments were not aimed at Don Jr.,” he said.

The on-the-record comments from Bannon sparked intense backlash from the White House, which has characterized Bannon’s cooperation with Wolff as a “betrayal.” The book has also distracted Republicans and forced them to answer questions about the president’s temperament and mental stability, even as congressional and Cabinet leaders gathered at Camp David over the weekend to chart their 2018 agenda.

Trump still seemed fixated on the situation Sunday, calling “Fire and Fury” a “Fake Book” on Twitter days after the first excerpts appeared online Wednesday. White House senior policy adviser Stephen Miller, in what turned into a hostile back-and-forth with host Jake Tapper, said on CNN that it was a “garbage book” containing nothing more than “poorly written fiction.” He also called Bannon’s comments “grotesque” and said the White House was “deeply disappointed.”

A day earlier, in a break from the Camp David meeting, Trump complained about U.S. libel laws.

“Libel laws are very weak in this country,” he said. “If they were stronger, hopefully, you would not have something like that happen.”

Wolff said on Sunday that the president himself, not merely Bannon, welcomed him into the White House.

“I remember [Trump] seemed deflated: ‘A book, who cares about a book?'” Wolff told Chuck Todd on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

“And I said, ‘But, you know, is it, is it OK?’ ‘Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah,'” Wolff said was the president’s response. “So then I went around, and so it was basically me saying, ‘The president says this is, this is — he likes this idea.'”

The Trump Tower meeting about which Bannon spoke to Wolff has become one of the focal points of the investigation into alleged collusion between Trump campaign officials and the Russian government.

The president lit into Bannon after the publication of excerpts from the book, telling the world that when his former chief strategist was fired he “not only lost his job, he lost his mind.” The Mercer family, wealthy backers who had previously supported Bannon, issued a rare statement distancing themselves from him.

Bannon insisted in his statement Sunday that he never meant to imply the campaign colluded with Russia. “There was no collusion and the investigation is a witch hunt,” he said.

Perhaps seeking to return to the president’s good graces, Bannon’s statement heaped praise on Trump, calling him “the only candidate that could have taken on and defeated the Clinton apparatus.”

“My support is also unwavering for the president and his agenda — as I have shown daily in my national radio broadcasts, on the pages of Breitbart News and in speeches and appearances from Tokyo and Hong Kong to Arizona and Alabama,” Bannon added.

Bannon had managed to stay in Trump’s orbit before earning his ire. Although he was fired in August, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders told reporters recently that Trump and Bannon spoke in December.

Andrew Restuccia contributed to this report.

4 Years After Heartbreak, Mirai Nagasu Is at Her Best and an Olympian Again

Mirai Nagasu broke into tears of joy when her scores were announced.Matthew Stockman/Getty Images

SAN JOSE, Calif. — If ever an athlete were entitled to immerse herself in bitterness and carry a glacial-sized chip on her shoulder, it was figure skater Mirai Nagasu.

Four years ago, Nagasu had her Olympic quest crushed not by a competitive failure but rather a boardroom decision. At the U.S. national championships, the last hurdle for those hoping to reach the Sochi Winter Olympics, Nagasu’s third-place finish seemingly cemented a spot on the American team.

But the U.S. Figure Skating‘s selection committee didn’t see it that way. “Body of work” was the operative phrase, and the committee reckoned that Nagasu’s performances that year didn’t measure up. It didn’t matter that Nagasu was a seasoned veteran who had thrived at the 2010 Olympics, placing fourth overall.

Instead, the final berth for the 2014 team went to Ashley Wagner, who had finished fourth at nationals. So Wagner headed to Russia, and Nagasu’s Olympic experience was limited to what she saw on television.

Accordingly, no one could have blamed Nagasu if she had spewed some long-simmering venom at this year’s nationals Friday night, when she locked up a trip to next month’s Pyeongchang Olympics with a stirring free skate that earned a silver medal.

Nagasu still had to wait for the selection committee to issue its official decision—at 5 a.m. Saturday, no less—but there wasn’t an iota of doubt that redemption was coming her way.

Instead of striking an I-told-you-so posture, Nagasu went down a different path. She took the selection committee off the hook and said yes, the decision in 2014 was the right one.

“Last Olympic cycle, I felt so disappointed in myself and I had so much regret,” Nagasu said. “I did finish in third place, but I was a little bit careless over the season, and I didn’t put out the body of work that I needed.”

This time around, she was determined to deliver a performance that couldn’t be overlooked.

“I put a lot of that responsibility on myself, and I didn’t want to feel that same way this year,” the 24-year-old Californian said. “I took on the full responsibility of becoming a stronger competitor and person, and I wasn’t going to let a decision that wasn’t mine keep me from my dreams.”

Rather than dwell on her four years in Olympic purgatory, she boiled her situation down to an analogy any young person can embrace.

“I think it’s like getting into a university,” Nagasu said. “If you don’t get in the first time, what are you going to do? Not apply again? No, you keep applying until you make it happen.”

At the age of 24, Nagasu brings a maturity to her performances.Matthew Stockman/Getty Images

That acceptance of her fate made Nagasu’s coach nearly as proud as the free skate that earned his pupil a standing ovation at the SAP Center in San Jose, California.

“I was getting a little choked up when she was talking, because we maybe spent all of five minutes talking about the decision from Sochi where she was left off the team in the four-plus years I’ve been coaching her,” said Tom Zakrajsek, who coaches Nagasu at the Broadmoor Skating Club in Colorado Springs, Colorado.

That was because, “I wasn’t interested in living the past with her; it was always about moving forward.”

And now, when Nagasu did finally air her feelings, it was with a maturity that understandably isn’t seen often in a sport that tends to be dominated by teenagers.

“That’s a great story for me, because most people have a hardship in their life and they blame and they point fingers and they say I was screwed over, blah, blah blah,” Zakrajsek said. “Mirai could have said that, right? And she could have been bitter. I’ve never heard her say that. And to hear that maturity in her; even in this moment she’s just owning it.”

The 2014 rejection had become Nagasu’s skating identity, supplanting the fact she had won a national championship in 2008 at the age of 14 and was narrowly denied a medal at the 2010 Olympics.

Nagasu was joined on the awards podium by champion Bradie Tennell, bronze medalist Karen Chen and Olympic alternate Ashley Wagner.Matthew Stockman/Getty Images

Now, however, she’s becoming known as only the second American woman to complete her gender’s most difficult jump, the triple axel. (Tonya Harding, way back in the ’90s, is the other.) Nagasu landed it in both her short program and her free skate, though both were less than perfect.

Still, the 3 ½-revolution triple axel is a potent weapon with big scoring potential that could push her into medal contention at Pyeongchang.

“She still hesitates a little bit. It’s still a new jump for her,” Zakrajsek said. “I’m really confident she’s going to do it. She’s going to do it like easy-peasy because she wants to. She won’t stop.”

Which is one more way Nagasu is setting an example for other figure skaters.

“She’s a woman now, she’s no longer a girl, and she learned a triple axel a year-and-a-half ago,” Zakrajsek said. “She didn’t learn it when she was 16 or 17. She learned it as a woman, when her mind and her body were strong enough.

“So those are great messages for young figure skaters not just in our country but all over the world … There are some very famous American skaters, they hit puberty, their bodies changed, and they didn’t do the sport anymore.”

The rigors that shorten the careers of female figure skaters were abundantly apparent at the nationals, where none of the 2014 U.S. Olympians qualified for a repeat trip.

Gracie Gold didn’t compete because she’s sorting out issues with depression and an eating disorder. Polina Edmunds, who fought injuries all season, withdrew from the free skate. And Wagner, who missed training time with an ankle infection, finished fourth.

The road wasn’t smooth for the two other U.S. women named to the Olympic team, either.

Champion Bradie Tennell was largely unknown until the last two months, because she has battled injuries the last two years. Bronze medalist Karen Chen was hit by an illness Thursday that sent her to a doctor and an acupuncturist.

“I have always believed that I am an amazing skater regardless of what the results say, and I think that determination and confidence has kept me in the game so long,” Nagasu said. “I’m aware that I’m the oldest here tonight, but I really feel like the comeback kid.”

And she performed like one, too.

           

Tom Weir covered eight Winter Olympics as a columnist for USA Today.

Marijuana sellers undeterred by threat of federal prosecution

CLOSE

The number of Americans who are in favor of legalizing marijuana continues to increase. A new Pew Research Survey says 6 out of 10 Americans now support the measure.
Buzz60

DENVER — Defiant marijuana entrepreneurs and investors are shrugging off threats of heightened federal prosecution and placing their faith in state lawmakers and a growing belief their industry is too big and popular to shut down.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions sowed confusion into the legal cannabis industry Thursday when he rescinded a series of Obama-era legal memos that had widely been interpreted as giving state-licensed marijuana businesses a pass from federal prosecutors.

But after their initial shock, cannabis entrepreneurs reminded themselves their industry had been — and remains — entirely illegal at the federal level, and forged ahead with growth plans.

“We’re tired of living in fear,” said Jessica Lilga, who runs a marijuana-distribution company in Oakland, Calif. “I’m not afraid. And I’m pushing forward.”

Colorado, which legalized marijuana in 2014, has about 35,000 people working in the legal marijuana industry, which generated more than $226 million in state-level taxes last year. California, which launched sales Jan. 1, could generate $300 million to $500 million in marijuana taxes this year, cannabis analytics firm New Frontier Data estimates.  

Those numbers are likely to grow. Marijuana entrepreneurs are betting big on the future of their industry, pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into greenhouses and lighting systems, and renting processing warehouses and retail space to sell pot to eager customers.

Lilga said California has invested too much time and energy into its legal marijuana marketplace, which opened Monday, to be deterred by some politicians in far-off Washington, D.C. California, like other states where voters approved recreational pot, has created a comprehensive framework to track and tax every marijuana plant grown and sold under its new law, and ordered cannabis business owners to pay tens of thousands of dollars for licenses.

“You’re either all in or you’re all out. And I’m all in,” Lilga said. “I just can’t believe they’d put me in jail. We’re too far along in the social acceptance scale.”

A recent Gallup poll found 64% of Americans support making marijuana legal for adults. Lawmakers from both parties have thrown their support behind legalization and decriminalization. And court victories have bolstered the cause.

Eight states, including California and Colorado, have legalized recreational marijuana and 30 states have approved some form of medical cannabis. 

‘A giant symbol’: In fight over Trump’s wall, Democrats who once supported a border barrier now oppose it

The Democrat-controlled Senate was nearing a make-or-break vote on a comprehensive immigration bill in June 2013 when a pair of Republican senators swooped in with an 11th-hour amendment aimed at clinching enough GOP support to avoid a filibuster.

A key provision: Doubling the length of a new border “fence” between the United States and Mexico from 350 miles to 700 miles.

Democrats didn’t think such a barrier was necessary. Neither did the Obama White House. To them, the proposal seemed arbitrary — a random doubling of the size at the last minute for political purposes. In the end, though, all 54 Democrats in the Senate supported the provision in hopes of realizing a bigger goal — providing a path to citizenship for millions of undocumented immigrants.

This month, President Trump is ratcheting up demands that Congress include his border wall in a package to provide legal status for hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the country illegally as children. The administration is preparing to ask for $18 billion over a decade to renovate and build a total of 700 miles of wall along the southwest border, according to a memo from the Department of Homeland Security.

Lawmakers face a March 5 deadline, set by Trump, after which work permits for the undocumented “dreamers” provided by former president Barack Obama under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program will begin to expire at a rate of nearly 1,000 per day.

But the debate illustrates how the political stakes have shifted since Trump took office.

Democrats, under pressure from immigrant rights groups, have strenuously opposed including Trump’s wall in the negotiations. They call it a waste of taxpayer money, but they also have signaled that the political price for helping the president make good on his prime campaign promise is far too high.

Trump, through his anti-immigrant rhetoric and policies, including a travel ban aimed at Muslim-majority countries, has made the wall a metaphor to many Democrats of an administration whose crackdown on immigration has overtones of xenophobia or racism.

“The debate over a wall goes back decades. The notion of a wall is a giant symbol that is not based on analysis in any way of whether we should do something about the border,” said Cecilia Muñoz, a longtime immigrant rights advocate who served as Obama’s domestic policy adviser. “The fact is, having elevated the notion of a wall in his campaign the way he did, the president made it an even bigger symbol than it already was — and that makes it much harder to accomplish.”

In a letter to colleagues Friday, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) called the Trump administration’s request for wall funding “alarming” and said her caucus “must all speak out.”

On the other side of the debate, wall proponents are perplexed why Democrats are voicing such vociferous opposition.

In 2006, President George W. Bush signed into law the Secure Fence Act, a bill that authorized the construction of hundreds of miles of fencing along the border. That legislation was approved with broad bipartisan support, including, in the Senate, by such Democratic luminaries as Barack Obama (Ill.), Hillary Clinton (N.Y.), Joe Biden (Del.) and Charles E. Schumer (N.Y.), now the Senate minority leader.

A look at Trump’s border wall prototypes View Graphic A look at Trump’s border wall prototypes

“Where I don’t understand the pushback is, in 2013 if everybody was for the 700 miles of double fencing, but now they’re not for it because Trump calls it a wall — to me that does not make sense,” said Brandon Judd, president of the National Border Patrol Council, the labor union for the border patrol agents. “Whether we call it a fence or call it a wall, it acts as the exact same thing — a physical barrier that makes it more difficult to enter the United States illegally. I don’t understand the whole fight over this.”

In a statement, Schumer said, “We’d be glad to do comprehensive immigration reform, like the Senate bill from 2013, that has more of what both sides want, but that will take time. There is an immediate need to protect the DACA recipients, so the deal will be more narrow than that.”

It’s not just the wall that has scrambled the debate. Trump also is demanding changes to the nation’s legal immigration system, including curbing what the president calls “chain migration” — the practice of immigrants petitioning for extended family members to enter the country — and terminating a diversity visa lottery that provides 55,000 green cards to people from countries with low immigration rates to the United States.

The 2013 immigration bill approved by the Senate — with 14 Republicans joining the 54 Democrats — included provisions to end that lottery and to eliminate the ability of brothers and sisters of U.S. citizens to enter the country on family reunification visas. That bill also created a new category of “merit-based” visas in which prospective immigrants were awarded points for education levels and work expertise — another concept Trump has championed.

Democrats insist it is not fair to compare the 2013 debate to the current one. Five years ago, the negotiations were aimed at a far more sweeping comprehensive bill to fix an immigration system both parties agreed was broken. That legislation included changes to worker visas, cleared lengthy backlogs in legal immigration waiting lists, and offered a path to citizenship for all of the nation’s estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants.

This year, the debate centers on the fate of a far smaller group. Nearly 700,000 dreamers were enrolled in the DACA program, started by Obama in 2012, when Trump terminated it in September. Not all dreamers had applied for the program, however, and all told, depending on how the group is defined, there could be a total of more than 1.5 million dreamers in the country, according to experts.

Democrats have eyed a Jan. 19 deadline for lawmakers to approve a must-pass spending bill as leverage to forge a narrow deal for some portion or all of this group.

Trump signaled last fall that, although he was adamant that lawmakers beef up border security, funding for a wall did not have to be tied to the dreamer issue. In recent months, however, the president has emphasized that any DACA legislation “must secure the border with a wall,” as he reiterated Thursday.

Lawmakers remain uncertain about exactly what Trump is asking for. During the campaign, he called for a contiguous wall along 2,000 miles of the border, something even the Border Patrol union does not think is necessary.

After meeting with Trump at the White House on Thursday, Republican senators said such talk is misguided

Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said that despite the president’s past campaign rhetoric, “he’s listened to border security” experts and now believes “there’s a need for walls and barriers in a number of places and the use of technology and personnel in others.”

Ultimately, Tillis said, Republicans are hoping for “a net increase of 600 miles of wall. That will be varying barriers based on where you are along the border, but that’s the long-term view.”

Democrats said privately that they need to hear directly from the White House just what Trump is proposing. Illegal crossings into the United States at the Mexican border have plummeted under Trump, making the need for a wall even less urgent in the mind of many lawmakers.

“If they’re really thinking that to give dreamers relief . . . that we’re going to give them significant monies towards a border wall,” Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) told reporters last month, “I can’t see that.”

Rep. Adriano Espaillat (D-N.Y.), whose Harlem-area district is home to approximately 2,700 constituents currently protected by DACA, called a wall a “nonstarter” in the dreamer negotiations.

Caving on a wall or on curbs to legal immigration in order to protect the dreamers is a wildly lopsided trade-off in favor of immigration hawks, Democrats said. Polls show that upward of 80 percent of the public favors a solution to allow dreamers to remain in the country, and some Republican lawmakers have said they support a deal — highlighting the complex politics for the GOP in a midterm-election year.

“This is a crisis they’ve created,” said Lorella Praeli, a former dreamer who became a U.S. citizen in 2015 and served as campaign adviser to Hillary Clinton. She now works as the ACLU’s director of immigration and campaigns.

Praeli said the Democratic strategy of supporting the border fence in 2013 in hopes that it would give the comprehensive immigration bill a better chance at becoming law was a mistake. The bill also would have spent $40 billion on border security, including nearly doubling the number of Border Patrol agents to 40,000 and adding high-tech surveillance equipment.

Although the Senate approved the bill by a 68-32 vote, it died in the Republican-controlled House where immigration hard-liners — opposed to granting “amnesty” to undocumented immigrants — forced then-Speaker John A. Boehner (Ohio) into shelving the legislation.

“They did the best they could under the context and politics at the time, but immigration politics have changed,” Praeli said. “There is a robust movement and accountability on Republicans and Democrats. Given the support on this issue and our constituency, we do not want to end up being in a situation where we say, ‘Sure, take what you need to give us a solution’ ” on the dreamers.

Mega Millions announces single winner for $450M jackpot

One lucky Mega Millions ticket holder in Florida has won a $450 million jackpot after matching all six numbers in the prize. Choosing the cash option would bring home $281 million.

The Florida Lottery announced that one winning Quick Pick ticket was purchased at a 7-Eleven in Port Richey, Florida. “The retailer will receive a $100,000 bonus commission for selling the jackpot-winning ticket,” the Florida Lottery said in a news release early Saturday.

The winning numbers drawn Friday just after 11 p.m. Eastern time were 28, 30, 39, 59, 70 and Gold Mega Ball 10.  It is the fourth-largest jackpot in the 15 year history of Mega Millions and the 10th largest prize in any U.S lottery.

The identity of the winner was not immediately available, although the winner cannot remain anonymous under Florida law. The winner’s name, city of residence and details on the winnings can be made public, while the winner’s home address and telephone numbers are to be kept “confidential,” according to the Florida Lottery website.

According to the website, only three Mega Millions jackpots have been larger than the most recent grand prize: a jackpot of $656 million in 2012; a jackpot of $648 million in 2013; and $536 million in 2016. 

A total of eight Match 5 winning tickets also were sold in Friday’s drawing — one each in California, Massachusetts, Tennessee and Virginia, and two each in Oklahoma and Texas. More than 21 million tickets were sold for all the prizes.

The Mega Millions jackpot now resets to its starting amount of $40 million ($25 million cash) for the next drawing on January 9. 

Powerball jackpot jumps to $570 million

Lottery officials also increased the jackpot of Powerball, the other national lottery game, to $570 million. That drawing is Saturday night.

The jackpots refer to the annuity options for both games, in which payments are made over 29 years. Most winners opt for cash options, which would be $358.5 million for Powerball.

Ahead of the drawing, Mega Millions players rushed out to snap up tickets, some in areas facing frigid temperatures after a Northeast snowstorm.

The odds of winning the Mega Millions jackpot was 1 in 302.5 million. Powerball has odds of 1 in 292.2 million.
    
Both games are played in 44 states plus Washington, D.C., and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Puerto Rico also participates in Powerball.

The average American spends about $200 a year on lottery tickets, although residents of some states spend far more. According to a study by LendEDU, the average Massachusetts resident spends $735 annually on lottery tickets, while those in Delaware or New York are likely spending about $400 a year, or $33 per month.

Twitter explains why it won’t block ‘world leaders’ — without naming Trump


President Trump’s Twitter feed is photographed on a computer screen in Washington on April 3. (J. David Ake/AP)

Some Twitter users have called, repeatedly, for the social network to block President Trump’s account — but a new statement from Twitter essentially says that is not going to happen.

Twitter has previously responded to complaints about Trump’s account by saying that certain users’ tweets have a “newsworthiness” value that makes it important to stay online and inform the network’s global conversation. Its Friday statement expanded on that idea, though this latest explanation did not mention Trump by name.

“Elected world leaders play a critical role in that conversation because of their outsized impact on our society,” the post said.  “Blocking a world leader from Twitter or removing their controversial tweets would hide important information people should be able to see and debate. It would also not silence that leader, but it would certainly hamper necessary discussion around their words and actions.”

Trump critics have pointed out many instances where it seems as though the president has violated Twitter’s terms of service with his messages. Most recently, Trump’s comments about North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and the respective sizes of North Korea and the United States’ “nuclear buttons” drew a fresh round of calls to censor his account.

Protesters this week projected messages on Twitter’s headquarters in San Francisco after the North Korea tweets, saying that either Trump or chief executive Jack Dorsey “must go.”


Protesters gather outside Twitter’s headquarters in San Francisco, and project messages on the building. (Geoffrey A. Fowler/The Washington Post)

Twitter’s attempt to handle political speech on its site — and defining when and how that overlaps with violent speech — has been a long and often confusing process. The company also introduced new policies last month that specifically exempted “military or government” groups from its policies prohibiting accounts that “use or promote violence against civilians to further their causes.” But even with Twitter’s latest clarifications, questions remain about how it defines and reviews political figures.

For example, Twitter in November declined to remove videos that Trump retweeted that were originally shared by Jayda Fransen, the deputy leader of a far-right group in Britain called Britain First. Twitter declined to take the videos down from Trump’s account — saying first that they were newsworthy, and then clarifying that they did not violate its policies.

But in December, Twitter deleted Fransen’s entire account, apparently as part of its crackdown on violent extremist groups. The videos disappeared from Trump’s when Fransen’s account was deleted.

It’s also not clear if there is an instance in which Twitter would remove a world leader’s messages or account.

“We review tweets by leaders within the political context that defines them, and enforce our rules accordingly,” the post said. “No one person’s account drives Twitter’s growth or influences these decisions. We work hard to remain unbiased with the public interest in mind.”

Twitter declined to elaborate on its blog post.

Trump, Defending His Mental Fitness, Says He’s a ‘Very Stable Genius’

The president’s engagement on the issue is likely to fuel the long-simmering argument about his state of mind that has roiled the political and psychiatric worlds and thrust the country into uncharted territory. Democrats in Congress have introduced legislation to force the president to submit to psychological evaluation. Mental health professionals have signed a petition calling for his removal from office. Others call armchair diagnoses a dangerous precedent or even a cover for partisan attacks.

In the past week alone, a new book resurfaced previously reported concerns among the president’s own advisers about his fitness for office, the question of his mental state came up at two White House briefings and the secretary of state was asked if Mr. Trump was mentally fit. After the president boasted that his “nuclear button” was bigger than Kim Jong-un’s in North Korea, Richard W. Painter, a former adviser to President George W. Bush, described the claim as proof that Mr. Trump is “psychologically unfit” and should have his powers transferred to Vice President Mike Pence under the Constitution’s 25th Amendment.

Mr. Trump’s self-absorption, impulsiveness, lack of empathy, obsessive focus on slights, tenuous grasp of facts and penchant for sometimes far-fetched conspiracy theories have generated endless op-ed columns, magazine articles, books, professional panel discussions and cable television speculation.

“The level of concern by the public is now enormous,” said Bandy X. Lee, a forensic psychiatrist at Yale School of Medicine and editor of “The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 27 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President,” a book released last fall. “They’re telling us to speak more loudly and clearly and not to stop until something is done because they are terrified.”

As Politico reported, Dr. Lee was invited to Capitol Hill last month to meet with about a dozen members of Congress to discuss the matter. But all but one of the lawmakers she briefed are Democrats. While some Republicans have raised concerns, they do so mostly in private. Others scoff at the question, dismissing it as outrageous character assassination.

Few questions irritate White House aides more than inquiries about the president’s mental well-being, and they argue that Mr. Trump’s opponents are trying to use those questions to achieve what they could not at the ballot box.

“This shouldn’t be dignified with a response,” said Kellyanne Conway, the White House counselor.

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story

“The partisans on Capitol Hill consulting with psychologists should reorient their spare time: support the president’s positive agenda of middle class tax cuts, rebuilding infrastructure and the military, investing in our work force,” Ms. Conway said later in an email. “The never-ending attempt to nullify an election is tiresome; if they were truly ‘worried about the country,’ they’d get to work to help it.”

Thomas J. Barrack, a friend of Mr. Trump’s, was quoted in Michael Wolff’s new book, “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,” as telling a friend that the president was “not only crazy but stupid.” In interviews, Mr. Barrack denied that and insisted that many people miss Mr. Trump’s actual brilliance.

“Potus has learned over time that Socratic testing and a lack of predictability is a worthy weapon in both negotiations and in keeping his team well honed, unentitled and on alert,” he said, using the initials for president of the United States. “He has no truck with political correctness, self-promotion or personal hubris of his team. This may cause him to appear at times to be overly realistic, blunt or to be politically insensitive even to his own subordinates. However, that is not the case.”

Still, in private, advisers to the president have at times expressed concerns. In private conversations over the last year, people who were new to Mr. Trump in the White House, which was most of the West Wing staff, have tried to process the president’s speaking style, his temper, his disinterest in formal briefings, his obsession with physical appearances and his concern about the theatrics and excitement of his job.

In conversations with friends, Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and senior adviser, has said Mr. Trump is “crazy but he’s a genius.” Other advisers speak about the president as a volatile personality who has to be managed carefully. While Mr. Wolff’s book generated enormous attention, news accounts over the past year have reported the president’s mood swings and unpredictable behavior.

Newsletter Sign Up

Continue reading the main story

The questions have prompted a sharp debate among mental health professionals about the so-called Goldwater rule adopted by the American Psychiatric Association barring members from evaluating anyone they have not personally examined, a rule generated in response to questions raised about Senator Barry Goldwater, the Republican presidential nominee in 1964.

Mr. Trump is due for his annual physical examination on Friday, but the White House would not say whether it would include mental acuity tests. Some psychiatrists have said it is irresponsible to throw around medical terms without an examination.

“These amateurs shouldn’t be diagnosing at a distance, and they don’t know what they’re talking about,” said Allen Frances, a former psychiatry department chairman at Duke University School of Medicine who helped develop the profession’s diagnostic standards for mental disorders.

Dr. Frances, author of “Twilight of American Sanity: A Psychiatrist Analyzes the Age of Trump,” said the president’s bad behavior should not be blamed on mental illness. “He is definitely unstable,” Dr. Frances said. “He is definitely impulsive. He is world-class narcissistic not just for our day but for the ages. You can’t say enough about how incompetent and unqualified he is to be leader of the free world. But that does not make him mentally ill.”

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story

Questions about presidential psychology are not new but have largely been shrouded in secrecy until now. Abraham Lincoln suffered from depression. John F. Kennedy secretly took prescription medicines to treat anxiety. Aides to Lyndon B. Johnson were so troubled that they sought out three psychiatrists, who concluded that his behavior could indicate paranoid disintegration.

Richard M. Nixon took Valium, and during his final days advisers took precautions intended to avoid any rash orders for military action. Late in his tenure, Ronald Reagan’s aides, concerned enough about his mental state, discussed whether to invoke the 25th Amendment. Only years later was Mr. Reagan diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease.

While Mr. Trump cited Mr. Reagan’s case in his tweet, the discussion of his capacity was far more restrained in public back then. Reporters who covered him, like Ann Compton of ABC News and Peter Maer of CBS News, said they knew he was a visibly aging, sometimes hazy man who struggled with facts. But there was less direct public questioning of his mental health until his final year in office with publication of a book disclosing the aides’ 25th Amendment debate.

Public discussion of mental issues has long been a political liability. Senator Thomas F. Eagleton withdrew as the Democrats’ vice-presidential candidate in 1972 after revelations that he had undergone electric shock therapy. Gov. Michael S. Dukakis, the Democratic presidential nominee in 1988, was forced to release records to dispute rumors that he had received psychiatric treatment. Bill Clinton’s aides were grilled on whether he was being treated for sex addiction.

Mr. Trump’s capacity has been discussed openly since the 2016 campaign. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, then a rival for the nomination, called him a “delusional narcissist.” Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, another Republican candidate, said: “I think he’s a kook. I think he’s crazy. I think he’s unfit for office.”

But fewer Republicans are willing to say that now that Mr. Trump is in office. Indeed, Mr. Graham in November chided the news media for trying “to label the guy some kind of kook not fit to be president,” even though he had said the exact same thing a year earlier.

One exception has been Senator Bob Corker of Tennessee, who said Mr. Trump had yet to “demonstrate the stability” required of a president.

For his part, Mr. Trump has accused his critics of being mentally impaired. He regularly describes adversaries with words like “crazy,” “psycho” and “nut job.”

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story

But the discussion has now reached a point where Secretary of State Rex W. Tillerson, who has been reported to have privately called Mr. Trump a “moron,” was asked to weigh in during an interview with CNN on Friday. “I’ve never questioned his mental fitness,” Mr. Tillerson said. “I have no reason to question his mental fitness.”

Democrats, however, say they do. Fifty-seven House Democrats have sponsored a bill to form an oversight commission on presidential capacity. The 25th Amendment, ratified in 1967, permits a president’s powers to be transferred to the vice president when the vice president and a majority of the cabinet or a body created by Congress conclude that the president is incapable of performing his duties. Congress has never created such a body.

Representative Jamie Raskin, a freshman Democrat from Maryland who drafted the legislation, said it was time for Congress to do so. He said his concern was as much about cognitive issues, citing the president’s occasional slurred speech and inability to form complete sentences.

“The 25th Amendment was passed in the nuclear age, and we have to keep faith with its central premise, which is there is a difference between capacity in a president and incapacity,” said Mr. Raskin. “We haven’t been forced to look at that question seriously before and now we are.”


Continue reading the main story

Iguanas are falling out of trees in Florida because it’s so cold. Please don’t pick them up.

On Thursday morning, Frank Cerabino, a columnist for the Palm Beach Post, woke up to 40-degree weather and was greeted by a “frozen iguana” lounging by his pool in Boca Raton.

He responded as many people probably would: He shared a photo on social media. Then he pondered, “What do you do?” he told the New York Times.

One of the strongest winter storms on the East Coast in modern history has pummeled cities with snow and sleet, forcing schools and businesses to close while grounding thousands of flights.

And in South Florida, it is “raining iguanas.”

Green iguanas, like all reptiles, are coldblooded animals, so they become immobile when the temperature falls to a certain level, said Kristen Sommers of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Under 50 degrees Fahrenheit, they become sluggish. Under 40 degrees, their blood stops moving as much, Sommers said.

They like to sit in trees, and “it’s become cold enough that they fall out.”

This is not a new phenomenon — there were similar reports in 2008 and 2010 — though it is not typical.

“The reality is South Florida doesn’t get that cold very often or long enough that you see this frequently,” Sommers said.

But what should one do with a fallen iguana?

Cerabino told the New York Times that he prodded the iguana with a pool skimmer.

“He didn’t move,” Mr. Cerabino said. “But he’s probably still alive. My experience is that they take a while to die.”

Maxine Bentzel, a reporter at CBS12 News, suggested that “iguanas have a good chance of thawing out if you move them into the sun.”

The experts would prefer you didn’t.

Sommers said the reptiles could become frightened as they warm.

“Like any wild animal, it will try to defend itself,” she said.

And there are cautionary tales.

Ron Magill of the Miami Zoo told WPLG TV in 2010 about a man who collected sleeping iguanas and threw them into the back of his station wagon. Then they awoke.

“All of a sudden these things are coming alive, crawling on his back and almost caused a wreck.”

The situation was much worse for iguanas in 2010, when temperatures in South Florida fell to the low 30s, the Sun Sentinel reported.

“Neighborhoods resounded with the thud of iguanas dropping from trees onto patios and pool decks,” Sun Sentinel reporter David Fleshler wrote.

Many iguanas died that year, as did other animals.

“Many pythons were reported dead, floating in the Everglades,” the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission said in a statement to the Palm Beach Post.

The deaths resulted from both the low temperatures and the length of time of the frigid weather.

The iguana population has since recovered, to the consternation of residents.

“We have been receiving more calls from people that are experiencing wildlife conflicts with iguanas. … Iguanas in their yard that they are not happy about, you’ve seen them further north in large numbers,” Sommers said.

According to the Sun Sentinel, iguanas arrived in Florida as pets, and once they escaped or were freed by their owners, first moved into Miami-Dade County in 1966, then to the Keys in 1995, before making a home of Broward County in 2001 and in Palm Beach in 2003.

The winter storm sweeping across parts of the East Coast has prompted animal rescue organizations and local authorities to issue warnings about giving pets shelter, with dogs left out to freeze to death in the cold.

In South Florida, the cooler temperatures also affect sea turtles, manatees and other animals. 

“Bats sometimes will fall out of the roost of trees when we have a pretty cold snap,” Sommers said.

Sommers said that while she’s heard of falling iguanas on social media, the agency hasn’t gotten any reports.

“There have not been an influx of calls to FWC about people worried about iguanas falling out of trees,” she said. “It’s not like something you see every year.”

But this is no ordinary weather.

On Thursday, the National Weather Service issued a freeze warning for parts of South Florida. According to the Sun Sentinel, temperatures in the area will be the coldest since the cold snap in December 2010.

Read more:

People are leaving dogs to freeze to death in the bitter cold

Sleeping woman sexually assaulted on plane by man sitting between her and his wife, officials say

How climate change could counterintuitively feed winter storms

East Coast blizzard unleashes epic flooding ahead of dangerous cold

The deadly winter storm that buried parts of the East Coast in more than a foot of snow brought epic flooding to Boston and its suburbs, where residents scrambled Friday morning to clean up ahead of a dangerous cold snap that could affect more than 100 million Americans.

The nor’easter that carried wind gusts as high as 60 mph generated a record 3-foot tidal surge along most of the Massachusetts coastline on Thursday afternoon. Meanwhile, Boston’s cityscape was transformed into an icy tundra with flooded streets that led to trapped cars and dramatic rescues by emergency responders and the National Guard.

“If anyone wants to question global warming, just see where the flood zones are,” Boston Mayor Marty Walsh said Thursday.



Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker called the high tide “historic,” and forecasters said the flooding appeared to at least tie the record tide swell during the blizzard of 1978. Less than 1,000 people were without power early Friday morning in eastern Massachusetts, the local utility reported.

In Plymouth County, partially frozen water breached a seawall and flooded homes. “We are watching it come up, come up, it is not going to get any higher,” resident Emily Anderson recounted to NBC Boston. “All of a sudden it is in our living room.”

Related: Millions face snow, travel chaos as ‘bomb cyclone’ clobbers Northeast

This winter storm phenomenon nicknamed a “bomb cyclone,” set off by a rapid drop in atmospheric pressure, began in the Southeast and brought rare snowfall to Florida. As it intensified, it led to messy commutes and thousands of flights being canceled or delayed.

As of Friday morning, there were still more than 1,400 flight cancellations and hundreds of delays, mostly in Boston and New York City, where airports began ramping up service.



While air and train travel was back on track, forecasters warned of more nasty weather: bitter and potentially record-setting Arctic air that will settle in through the weekend.

Dangerous wind chills are expected to stretch from parts of Georgia and South Carolina up through Maine and as far west as North Dakota.

Photos: ‘Bomb cyclone’ slams East Coast with wind and snow

“It’s going to be extremely uncomfortable for a lot of us as we go through the days ahead,” said Heather Tesch, a meteorologist for The Weather Channel, adding that over a dozen records for low temperatures across several states could be shattered into Saturday. “Remember, there are people without power due to the recent storm.”

So how low will the temperatures go?

By Saturday morning, the wind chill will make it feel like 20 degrees below in Minneapolis, 11 degrees below in Chicago, 10 degrees below in Boston, 5 degrees below in New York and 0 degrees in Washington, D.C., according to The Weather Channel.



The South won’t be spared either: Charleston, South Carolina, will feel like 26 degrees, Atlanta like 18 degrees and parts of northern and central Florida less than 30 degrees.

Meteorologists warn that with a windchill at 20 degrees below, frostbite can kick in within just 30 minutes.

This next round of cold air follows a sustained period of brutally cold weather linked to the deaths of at least 24 people since Dec. 26.

In addition, the winter storm this week led to the deaths of at least eight people. Three died in North Carolina, where Gov. Roy Cooper said two people were killed when a truck ran off the road and overturned in a creek in Moore County and where authorities said a third person was killed when a vehicle crashed into a canal in Surf City.

Photos: Normally balmy southeastern coast blanketed in snow

In Lower Moreland Township, Pennsylvania, near Philadelphia, a passenger in a car was killed when the vehicle couldn’t stop at the bottom of a steep, snow-covered hill, crashed through the crossing gate and slammed into a commuter train, police said.

Two deaths occurred Thursday in Virginia, local police said: In Hampton, a 75-year-old private contractor who was clearing snow from a parking lot died after he was struck by a snowplow.

And a young girl in Chesterfield County died in the hospital after she was struck by a pickup truck while sledding down her driveway and into the street, where she came into the path of the car.

Officials in Suffolk County, Long Island, also confirmed Friday that two people died Thursday during the storm. The men, both in their mid-50s, suffered “cardiac injuries” while shoveling or removing snow.